cover of book
 

In Defense of Negativity: Attack Ads in Presidential Campaigns
by John G. Geer
University of Chicago Press, 2006
Cloth: 978-0-226-28498-9 | Paper: 978-0-226-28499-6 | eISBN: 978-0-226-28500-9
Library of Congress Classification JK2281.G44 2006
Dewey Decimal Classification 324.730973

ABOUT THIS BOOK | AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY | REVIEWS | TOC | REQUEST ACCESSIBLE FILE
ABOUT THIS BOOK
Americans tend to see negative campaign ads as just that: negative. Pundits, journalists, voters, and scholars frequently complain that such ads undermine elections and even democratic government itself. But John G. Geer here takes the opposite stance, arguing that when political candidates attack each other, raising doubts about each other’s views and qualifications, voters—and the democratic process—benefit. 

In Defense of Negativity, Geer’s study of negative advertising in presidential campaigns from 1960 to 2004, asserts that the proliferating attack ads are far more likely than positive ads to focus on salient political issues, rather than politicians’ personal characteristics. Accordingly, the ads enrich the democratic process, providing voters with relevant and substantial information before they head to the polls.

An important and timely contribution to American political discourse, In Defense of Negativity concludes that if we want campaigns to grapple with relevant issues and address real problems, negative ads just might be the solution.

See other books on: Campaigns & Elections | Defense | Election | Political campaigns | Presidents
See other titles from University of Chicago Press

Reference metadata exposed for Zotero via unAPI.