“Neither Donkey nor Horse is a major work by the leading scholar in the field of modern Chinese medical history. Lei argues that what we now know as traditional Chinese medicine as it emerged as a discourse in the early twentieth century was fundamentally shaped by the encounter with Western medicine and the relationship with the state that this dictated. Chinese medicine was something new that was created during this period in response to themes with Western biomedicine as traditional practitioners sought social mobility through participation in the state. Lei’s argument is backed up by research of the highest standard: his knowledge of the historical sources is outstanding, and he is impressively familiar with the secondary and theoretical literature in both English and Chinese. His book will be of interest not only to historians of Republican China but also to those interested in the history of science more widely.”
— Henrietta Harrison, University of Oxford
“Reaching far beyond the history of modern China, Neither Donkey nor Horse challenges conventional understanding of modernity, science, and state power through an intellectual and social history of medical debate and development in East Asia from the late nineteenth century forward. This is a thoughtful and meticulously researched investigation of transnational modernizing processes in the twentieth century as they touched down and transformed worlds in China. The book demonstrates that medical knowledge and practice, whether ‘modern’ or ‘traditional,’ historicized or fixed as policy, are nowhere innocent of politics, culture, and social hierarchy. It offers surprising historical lessons for everyone interested in science and local knowledge, socialism and capitalism, institutions and ideas about nature as they weave together in modern regimes of health and population governance.”
— Judith Farquhar, University of Chicago
“In this insightful and provocative book, Lei shows us what it meant to practice ‘modern’ medicine in Mao Zedong’s semicolonial and semifeudal society. Drawing on rich historical sources, Neither Donkey nor Horse reveals that modern medicine will always be mongrel medicine. Importantly, Lei gives us the critical postcolonial genealogy for ‘Traditional Chinese Medicine,’ the epitome of Chinese modernity, now a global phenomenon.”
— Warwick Anderson, University of Sydney
“Neither Donkey nor Horse is a tour de force of how both Western and Chinese medicine played central roles not only in Chinese modernity but also the formation of the state in Republican China. Lei thus adroitly relates the politics of medicine and debates over making Chinese medicine more scientific to the big themes of nationalism, the state, and modernity that dominated the political struggles of early twentieth-century China.”
— Marta Hanson, Johns Hopkins University
“If you are going to read just one book on the modern history of Chinese medicine, this is the work to read. Lei’s analysis of the entwinement of medicine, science, modernity, and the state is brilliantly original and persuasive, and argued with admirable clarity. Neither Donkey nor Horse is a major contribution to science studies and the history of global health, as well as to the study of twentieth-century China.”
— Shigehisa Kuriyama, Harvard University
"In conceptualizing how the insights of critical interdisciplines—postcolonial studies or science studies—might be incorporated into the field of Asian history, two possible scenarios come to mind: in one, critical vocabularies are selectively adopted but the overall enterprise remains unmoved; in another, the foundational issues at stake in the interdiscipline become themselves the subject of the Asia historian, thus transforming the questions that are asked and the way research is carried out. It is the latter approach that Lei brilliantly demonstrates in Neither Donkey Nor Horse."
— Chinese Literature and Culture
"Neither Donkey Nor Horse is thoroughly engaging, theoretically informed, and impeccably researched. This complex story, though acknowledging the intricacies and vagaries of history, does not get bogged down in its own detail. Instead, Lei’s skillful narrative hand remains positioned above the fray, ready to guide the reader across thematic and temporal divides. It is a fascinating story, and one that will do much to advance the field of medical history in the non-West."
— Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
"This book is equally about the surprising and dynamic history of Chinese medicine, Western medicine, and the modern Chinese state, and it deserves the careful attention of historians of China and state-building as much as historians of medicine and science. . . . Lei's intervention provides the most sophisticated and clear explanation yet of the issues involved."
— Social History of Medicine
"Neither Donkey Nor Horse is a tremendous accomplishment that marks Lei as a leading historian of Chinese medicine and a major thinker in acience and technology studies. With this book, Lei has set a conceptual framework that will shape all future work on the subject."
— East Asian Science, Technology and Society
"It is difficult to overestimate the value of this book. Empirically rich and theoretically sophisticated, it presents the most comprehensive analysis to date of medical developments in twentieth-century China. This book delights at every turn; every chapter uses exhaustive research to build a sophisticated argument. It will be duly recognized as a masterpiece."
— Bulletin of the History of Medicine
"Neither Donkey nor Horse is an important book for the global community of traditional medicines. It
deserves to be accompanied by countless more scholarly works about coevolution and adaptation by traditional medicine. this book is an important read for all types of medicine practitioners. Everyone will find something of interest regarding research design, policy development, healthcare administration, medical education, professional organization, or infectious disease control and response. These areas are as relevant today as they were a century ago. As new global health issues, such as the outbreak of the Zika and the Ebola viruses, emerge and require continued adaptation of healthcare policy and research methods, the lessons revealed in this story will no doubt continue to be essential."
— Meridians
"Whereas previous studies have tended to shy away from delving directly into the encounter between Chinese-style and Western-style medicine, this book represents the most innovative and magisterial treatment to date of the transformation of Chinese medicine in the first half of the twentieth century."
— Journal of the History of Medicine
"Going beyond the simplistic polarities of modern versus traditional, or biomedical science versus traditional Chinese medical knowledge, Lei claims that Chinese medicine practitioners, struggling in the field of the state, were the agents of a profound transformation of Chinese medicine, creating a mongrel medicine that may or may not be able to reproduce itself in the future. By discussing the development of bilateral and organic relations between the state and medicine, Lei has vividly described the reassembling of Chinese medicine as a part of the realisation of China’s own version of modernity. The great contemporary relevance of this book lies in pointing out diverse aspects of the ideas and phenomena that we have often taken for granted as being homogeneous, such as modernity and science."
— Medical History
"Neither Donkey nor Horse is intensely argued and contains a great wealth of materials and information. It offers both a panoramic view and strong theses. Its analysis is sharp and stimulating. Although Lei is theory-minded, his prose is clear and accessible. The book is easily
the best scholarly work on the history of Chinese medicine of the Republican period. It will be essential reading for anyone interested in the history of modern Chinese medicine and indeed should be an important reference for students of the history of Republican China."
— Frontiers of History in China
“Lei’s book is full of sophisticated analyses, cogent arguments, and illuminating insights. The brilliant use of the diary of Nationalist officials to be read alongside official documents and media reports opens up a window on private perceptions of largely public events.”
— Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences