|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
Imagination and Interpretation in Kant: The Hermeneutical Import of the Critique of Judgment
University of Chicago Press, 1990 Paper: 978-0-226-50277-9 | Cloth: 978-0-226-50276-2 Library of Congress Classification B2784.M27 1990 Dewey Decimal Classification 121
ABOUT THIS BOOK | TOC | REQUEST ACCESSIBLE FILE
ABOUT THIS BOOK
In this illuminating study of Kant's theory of imagination and its role in interpretation, Rudolf A. Makkreel argues against the commonly held notion that Kant's transcendental philosophy is incompatible with hermeneutics. The charge that Kant's foundational philosophy is inadequate to the task of interpretation can be rebutted, explains Makkreel, if we fully understand the role of imagination in his work. In identifying this role, Makkreel also reevaluates the relationship among Kant's discussions of the feeling of life, common sense, and the purposiveness of history. See other books on: 1724-1804 | Hermeneutics | Imagination | Interpretation | Kant, Immanuel See other titles from University of Chicago Press |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Nearby on shelf for Philosophy (General) / By period / Modern:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Imagination and Interpretation in Kant: The Hermeneutical Import of the Critique of Judgment
ABOUT THIS BOOK | TOC | REQUEST ACCESSIBLE FILE
University of Chicago Press, 1990
Paper: 978-0-226-50277-9
Cloth: 978-0-226-50276-2
Paper: 978-0-226-50277-9
Cloth: 978-0-226-50276-2
In this illuminating study of Kant's theory of imagination and its role in interpretation, Rudolf A. Makkreel argues against the commonly held notion that Kant's transcendental philosophy is incompatible with hermeneutics. The charge that Kant's foundational philosophy is inadequate to the task of interpretation can be rebutted, explains Makkreel, if we fully understand the role of imagination in his work. In identifying this role, Makkreel also reevaluates the relationship among Kant's discussions of the feeling of life, common sense, and the purposiveness of history.
ABOUT THIS BOOK | TOC | REQUEST ACCESSIBLE FILE
