If free market advocates had total control over education policy, would the shared public system of education collapse? Would school choice revitalize schooling with its innovative force? With proliferating charters and voucher schemes, would the United States finally make a dramatic break with its past and expand parental choice?

Those are not only the wrong questions—they’re the wrong premises, argue philosopher Sigal R. Ben-Porath and historian Michael C. Johanek in Making Up Our Mind. Market-driven school choices aren’t new. They predate the republic, and for generations parents have chosen to educate their children through an evolving mix of publicly supported, private, charitable, and entrepreneurial enterprises. The question is not whether to have school choice. It is how we will regulate who has which choices in our mixed market for schooling—and what we, as a nation, hope to accomplish with that mix of choices. Looking beyond the simplistic divide between those who oppose government intervention and those who support public education, the authors make the case for a structured landscape of choice in schooling, one that protects the interests of children and of society, while also identifying key shared values on which a broadly acceptable policy could rest.

Sigal R. Ben-Porath is professor of education, philosophy, and political science at the University of Pennsylvania. Her most recent book is Free Speech on Campus. Michael C. Johanek is senior fellow at the Graduate School of Education at the University of Pennsylvania, as well as profesor invitado internacional at the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. His most recent book is Repositioning Educational Leadership, a coedited volume.
 

— David F. Labaree, author of A Perfect Mess: The Unlikely Ascendancy of Higher Education

— Tracy Steffes, Brown University

— John L. Rury, University of Kansas

— Kate Rousmaniere, Miami University, Ohio

— A. Muhammad, Appalachian State University, Choice

— Harvard Education Review