|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Crossings: Nietzsche and the Space of Tragedy
University of Chicago Press, 1991 Cloth: 978-0-226-73436-1 | Paper: 978-0-226-73437-8 Library of Congress Classification B3313.G43S24 1991 Dewey Decimal Classification 193
ABOUT THIS BOOK | TOC | REQUEST ACCESSIBLE FILE
ABOUT THIS BOOK
Boldly contesting recent scholarship, Sallis argues that The Birth of Tragedy is a rethinking of art at the limit of metaphysics. His close reading focuses on the complexity of the Apollinian/Dionysian dyad and on the crossing of these basic art impulses in tragedy. "Sallis effectively calls into question some commonly accepted and simplistic ideas about Nietzsche's early thinking and its debt to Schopenhauer, and proposes alternatives that are worth considering."—Richard Schacht, Times Literary Supplement See other books on: 1844-1900 | Appreciation | Metaphysics | Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm | Space See other titles from University of Chicago Press |
 Reference metadata exposed for Zotero via unAPI. | |
Crossings: Nietzsche and the Space of Tragedy
ABOUT THIS BOOK | TOC | REQUEST ACCESSIBLE FILE
University of Chicago Press, 1991
Cloth: 978-0-226-73436-1
Paper: 978-0-226-73437-8
Cloth: 978-0-226-73436-1
Paper: 978-0-226-73437-8
Boldly contesting recent scholarship, Sallis argues that
The Birth of Tragedy is a rethinking of art at the
limit of metaphysics. His close reading focuses on the
complexity of the Apollinian/Dionysian dyad and on the
crossing of these basic art impulses in tragedy.
"Sallis effectively calls into question some commonly
accepted and simplistic ideas about Nietzsche's early
thinking and its debt to Schopenhauer, and proposes
alternatives that are worth considering."—Richard
Schacht, Times Literary Supplement
The Birth of Tragedy is a rethinking of art at the
limit of metaphysics. His close reading focuses on the
complexity of the Apollinian/Dionysian dyad and on the
crossing of these basic art impulses in tragedy.
"Sallis effectively calls into question some commonly
accepted and simplistic ideas about Nietzsche's early
thinking and its debt to Schopenhauer, and proposes
alternatives that are worth considering."—Richard
Schacht, Times Literary Supplement
ABOUT THIS BOOK | TOC | REQUEST ACCESSIBLE FILE
