cover of book
 

Originalism and the Good Constitution
by John O. McGinnis and Michael B. Rappaport
Harvard University Press, 2013
eISBN: 978-0-674-72626-0 | Cloth: 978-0-674-72507-2
Library of Congress Classification KF4552.M34 2013
Dewey Decimal Classification 342.730011

ABOUT THIS BOOK | TOC
ABOUT THIS BOOK
Originalism holds that the U.S. Constitution should be interpreted according to its meaning at the time it was enacted. In their innovative defense of originalism, John McGinnis and Michael Rappaport maintain that the text of the Constitution should be adhered to by the Supreme Court because it was enacted by supermajorities--both its original enactment under Article VII and subsequent Amendments under Article V. A text approved by supermajorities has special value in a democracy because it has unusually wide support and thus tends to maximize the welfare of the greatest number.

The authors recognize and respond to many possible objections. Does originalism perpetuate the dead hand of the past? How can originalism be justified, given the exclusion of African Americans and women from the Constitution and many of its subsequent Amendments? What is originalism's place in interpretation, after two hundred years of non-originalist precedent? A fascinating counterfactual they pose is this: had the Supreme Court not interpreted the Constitution so freely, perhaps the nation would have resorted to the Article V amendment process more often and with greater effect. Their book will be an important contribution to the literature on originalism, now the most prominent theory of constitutional interpretation.

See other books on: Constitutional | Constitutional law | Constitutions | Courts | Judicial review
See other titles from Harvard University Press
Nearby on shelf for Law of the United States / Federal law. Common and collective state law. Individual states: