|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
LITIGATION AS LOBBYING: REPRODUCTIVE HAZARDS & INTEREST AGGREGATION
The Ohio State University Press, 2003 eISBN: 978-0-8142-7878-9 | Cloth: 978-0-8142-0942-4 | Paper: 978-0-8142-5722-7 Library of Congress Classification KF8775.G66 2003 Dewey Decimal Classification 342.7305
ABOUT THIS BOOK | AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY | TOC
ABOUT THIS BOOK
This book is a case study that shows how interest groups use the litigation process to further their policy agendas. The case detailed here revolves around issues of reproductive health. It is a good illustration of the commonly held view among judicial scholars that the judicial process is essentially the same as the political process, that in both cases there is room for influence from a variety of sources. See other books on: Human reproduction | Law and legislation | Legal status, laws, etc | Political questions and judicial power | Pressure groups See other titles from The Ohio State University Press |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Nearby on shelf for Law of the United States / Federal law. Common and collective state law. Individual states:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![](https://www.bibliovault.org/thumbs/978-0-8135-3804-4-thumb.jpg ""This Honorable Court": The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, 1789-2000")
LITIGATION AS LOBBYING: REPRODUCTIVE HAZARDS & INTEREST AGGREGATION
ABOUT THIS BOOK | AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY | TOC
The Ohio State University Press, 2003
eISBN: 978-0-8142-7878-9
Cloth: 978-0-8142-0942-4
Paper: 978-0-8142-5722-7
eISBN: 978-0-8142-7878-9
Cloth: 978-0-8142-0942-4
Paper: 978-0-8142-5722-7
This book is a case study that shows how interest groups use the litigation process to further their policy agendas. The case detailed here revolves around issues of reproductive health. It is a good illustration of the commonly held view among judicial scholars that the judicial process is essentially the same as the political process, that in both cases there is room for influence from a variety of sources.
ABOUT THIS BOOK | AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY | TOC
