"Siting Postcoloniality should be most appreciated for its vanguard effort to nuance and update postcolonial theory by unpacking the illuminating relevance of the Sinosphere experiences. Correcting the field’s long-standing geographical bias against Sinitic-influenced regions, the volume brims with insights on fluid subjectivities rooted in the dialectics of coloniality and temporality."
-- Chan Cheow Thia Southeast Asian Studies
"Overall, this is a strong volume that both augments existing discourses and suggests new possibilities for postcolonial studies across a portion of the Sinosphere. . . . [T]he clarity and quality of writing is, on the whole, excellent, and chapters are either accessible as introductory pieces to specific topics or make clear and compelling intellectual contributions to their relevant fields."
-- Kyle Shernuk Modern Chinese Literature and Culture
"Peng Cheah and Caroline Hau, together with the other contributors, have successfully worked towards remedying a grave problem within the field of postcolonialism, and they justly point out that East and Southeast Asia have an important and rightful place within this academic field . . . it is an important vantage point for further study, and invaluable to anyone interested in postcolonialism and/or East and Southeast Asia."
-- Tijs Hopman IIAS Review
"Siting Postcoloniality is a theoretically dazzling volume that reinvigorates the field of post colonial theory by shifting its conceptual referentiality to the East Asian Sinosphere. . . . [It] injects postcolonial theory with new momentum. It successfully overcomes the Eurocentric and Atlantic biases in previous iterations of postcolonialism by showcasing how Sinophone Asian sites encompass both historical agents of imperialism and afterlives of postcolonial formations."
-- Alvin K. Wong Asian Studies Review
"Postcolonial theory has much to learn from scholars of East and Southeast Asia. . . . Siting Postcoloniality powerfully testifies to the rewards of taking on those cases that may seem to fit poorly with existing theory."
-- Nicolai Volland Comparative Literature Studies