Freedom as Marronage
by Neil Roberts
University of Chicago Press, 2015
Cloth: 978-0-226-12746-0 | Paper: 978-0-226-20104-7 | Electronic: 978-0-226-20118-4
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226201184.001.0001
ABOUT THIS BOOKAUTHOR BIOGRAPHYREVIEWSTABLE OF CONTENTS

ABOUT THIS BOOK

What is the opposite of freedom? In Freedom as Marronage, Neil Roberts answers this question with definitive force: slavery, and from there he unveils powerful new insights on the human condition as it has been understood between these poles. Crucial to his investigation is the concept of marronage—a form of slave escape that was an important aspect of Caribbean and Latin American slave systems. Examining this overlooked phenomenon—one of action from slavery and toward freedom—he deepens our understanding of freedom itself and the origin of our political ideals.
           
Roberts examines the liminal and transitional space of slave escape in order to develop a theory of freedom as marronage, which contends that freedom is fundamentally located within this space—that it is a form of perpetual flight. He engages a stunning variety of writers, including Hannah Arendt, W. E. B. Du Bois, Angela Davis, Frederick Douglass, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, and the Rastafari, among others, to develop a compelling lens through which to interpret the quandaries of slavery, freedom, and politics that still confront us today. The result is a sophisticated, interdisciplinary work that unsettles the ways we think about freedom by always casting it in the light of its critical opposite.  

AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY

Neil Roberts is associate professor of Africana studies and a faculty affiliate in political science at Williams College.

REVIEWS

“Freedom as Marronage is an exciting, well-conceived, and passionately argued work of political theory and Africana thought. Roberts’s distinctive understanding of freedom is especially welcome in the context of political theory and philosophy, where slavery still appears largely (if at all) as either a metaphor or a signpost of moral and political progress. As he shows, thinking through the legacies of enslavement and the flight from it is essential to understanding freedom in a postcolonial, post-apartheid, post-civil rights moment.”
— Lawrie Balfour, University of Virginia

“Blazing a path through critical discussions of republican theory, the writings of Frederick Douglass and Edouard Glissant, the Haitian Revolution, and Rastafari, Freedom as Marronage confronts readers with a deceivingly simple question: how does a person become ‘free’? Freedom, Neil Roberts answers, cannot be understood without considering the dominant term that opposes freedom in political modernity: slavery. However, instead of treating these as opposite conditions and states of being—or rather, more strictly speaking, as Roberts posits following Frantz Fanon, as a state of being opposed to a zone of nonbeing—Freedom as Marronage shows that freedom emerges in enslaved persons’ escape from and active negation of slavery. . . . Consequently, despite the infamous and widely cited consignment of slaves to what Orlando Patterson called a condition of ‘social death,’ Roberts insists that enslaved persons do not in fact lack agency. In and by marronage, a formerly enslaved person, whether alone or together with others, asserts herself as an agent capable of altering the circumstances and political relations that condition her being. The emphasis on slave agency constitutes an important intervention in political theory at this moment, just after the sesquicentennial of the Emancipation Proclamation, which is still widely understood as having ‘freed’—juridically, from above—many (but not all) slaves in the United States. . . . Certainly, Freedom as Marronage proves that Roberts does not write in a tentative voice but always takes his stances boldly.”
— Perspectives on Politics

“Freedom is a keyword in modern political thought and culture. Yet, as Roberts convincingly shows, modern political thinkers tend to analyze the concept using the freedoms of the powerful and the privileged to inform their conceptual frames. His wager, which pays off spectacularly, is that readers can gain fresh insights by starting with the history of resistance to slavery. He calls this new conception of freedom  ‘freedom as marronage.’ Roberts’s book is not merely an ideology critique that shows how dominant conceptions of freedom exclude the experiences of subordinate others. Rather, it is a detailed and nuanced exploration of the kinds of flight from slavery, their nature, and their limits. The result is a unique contribution to contemporary political thought: the idea of freedom as an ever-shifting process occurring in the liminal space of the slave escape. . . . Freedom as Marronage is clearly written and expertly researched. It is essential reading for those interested in the history of slavery, the concept of freedom, and critical theory. . . . Essential.”
— Choice

“Freedom as Marronage is a welcome addition to a growing body of work that is challenging Western political theory and Western political philosophy from the perspective of a decolonial agenda. . . . One of the most valuable features of this book is its self-conscious and explicit drawing on the black slave and post-slave experience—New World African enslavement, marronage of different varieties, the Haitian slave revolution, post-emancipation racial oppression in conditions of nominal freedom—as a resource for political theory. By taking this subaltern history as his archive—‘dread history’ in the coinage of the Jamaican Rastafari—Roberts demonstrates what rich political raw materials lie waiting for the theorist with the courage to stray beyond the bounds of the Western estate.”
 
— Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy

“Could there be a topic in Western political theory as thoroughly analyzed—indeed as exhausted—as freedom? But it all depends on whose liberties have been framing your conceptual investigation. Taking up the perspective of the ‘dread history’ of Afro-modernity—a history of slavery, revolt, and marronage—Roberts opens up for us an exciting new conceptual terrain unexplored by the hegemonic Euro-narrative. In the process, he makes irrefutably clear the extent to which modern Western political theory has been constructed on the silencing of the voices of resistance of the West’s subordinated racial Others.”
— Charles W. Mills, Northwestern University

“Freedom as Marronage is not only an illuminating exegesis on the self-activity of enslaved people to create free space for living but an utterly brilliant meditation on the fundamental meaning of freedom in the modern world. Political theorists, historians, philosophers, and cultural critics take heed: Roberts is a thinker to be reckoned with.”
— Robin D. G. Kelley, author of Freedom Dreams: The Black Radical Imagination

“Freedom as Marronage holds up the incisive modes of critique of the Black Radical Tradition: works like Cedric Robinson’s Black Marxism: The Making of the Black Radical Tradition or Walter Rodney’s How Europe Underdeveloped Africa, while also appealing to, even destabilizing, the conventions of more traditional political science theory. Whether or not the rigid functionalist tenants of American political science are able to hear the radical theories of freedom raised by black maroon history remains uncertain, but to be sure the foundations of such a stogy pragmatist discourse will have been shaken by the publication of Freedom as Marronage.”
 
— Black Critical and Cultural Theory

"Neil Roberts’s ambitious and timely intervention argues that political freedom must be thought in relation to the existence and experience of slavery. His bold call to understand “freedom as marronage” is also motivated by the important project of “creolizing political theory” by grounding it in black historical experience and paying close attention to how black thinkers have reflected on that experience."
— SX Salon

“In Freedom as Marronage, Roberts insists that a new theory of freedom emerges from the Haitian Revolution, but each instance of formulating this new thought seems to demonstrate, instead, a more rigorousapplication of the tenets of freedom and fraternity in the French Revolution. Where there is a difference is through dynamics of creolization, of African, European, and indigenous American conceptions of legitimating practices in the struggle for freedom. That the Black slaves chose, for example, the Native American name for the island as the one for their republic is a case in point. Roberts responds to and builds on these criticisms through theoretical reflection on the concept of marronage, whose etymology points to the sea, to what it means to be lost at sea from one perspective, stuck on an island in another. It refers to the consciousness of enslaved Africans in the Caribbean, whose hopes to return to Africa (home) were challenged by the sea in every direction. Roberts shows how, in such modern isolation on the one hand and the constant, brutal realities of slavery on the other, the enslaved’s conceptions of freedom were affected; would, for example, being marooned, being ‘stranded,’ lead to a form of stoic resignation as the formulation of freedom or more active forms of resistance, what the revolutionary psychiatrist, political theorist, and philosopher Frantz Fanon refers to as becoming ‘actional’? Roberts works through Hannah Arendt, Phillip Petit, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and Frederick Douglass in a debate over such topics as the impact of racialized slavery on conceptions of freedom to problems with the dialectics of recognition as the basis of securing freedom and dignity for the self.  Particularly powerful is Roberts’s discussion of Coleridge’s impact on Douglass’s thought. Roberts reveals, in Coleridge, a profound existential commitment against bondage and an understanding of freedom that transcends mere liberty. This book, then, is an exemplar of the creolization of theory, of theory from the global south reaching beyond the institutional location of its author in northern provinces, to articulate freedom and the quest for human dignity beyond the confines of Euromodernity to the heart and soul of a human world in need of learning much from its always present dark side. It’s a splendid addition to the bourgeoning movement of creative political thought from Afro-modernity and beyond. A must read for those interested in knowing, proverbially, otherwise.”
— Lewis R. Gordon, University of Connecticut, Université Toulouse Jean Jaurès, and Rhodes University

"Roberts offers a new and exciting analysis of the relationship of slavery to freedom. He reviews the extant literature to reject the idea that slavery and freedom are inherently inert conditions enjoyed separate and apart from the other. Roberts finds that the well renowned historian John Hope Franklin, as well as the respected fathers of modern philosophy such as Hobbs, Berlin and Kant, all viewed slavery and freedom as inertia since they ignore flight in their theories on slavery and slave agency. . . . Roberts’ ideas on how the lived experience of marronage achieved political freedom are both new and refreshing. He does a superb job discussing how it was a non-sovereign imaginary of freedom that moved more than a half million African slaves to take flight from slavery and begin the business of building a new polity known as the nation of Haiti. In the words of Neil Roberts, the masses of Haiti dared to be free by themselves and for themselves."
— National Political Science Review

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Acknowledgments

Part I: On Slavery, Agency, and Freedom

- Neil Roberts
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226201184.003.0001
[Aimé Césaire, freedom, flight, fugitive theory, marronage, Patterson, rethinking political theory, James C. Scott, slavery, Western theory]
This chapter frames the context for the main interrelated questions the book answers: 1) what are some distinct concepts of freedom emerging out of the experience of slavery? 2) What important insights does analyzing the relationship between slavery and freedom provide to political theorists that they do not know, have ignored, or have not sufficiently investigated? The introduction defines the concept of marronage, first by explaining its historical and conventional usages; and second, by delineating novel forms of marronage employed subsequently in the book. It utilizes the work Aimé Césaire and James C. Scott to accomplish. Furthermore, it outlines key dimensions of flight absent from contemporary fugitive theory and provides a rationalization for why marronage is an essential heuristic device. The chapter turns to demarcation of two alternative traditions of freedom theorizing in Western thought (negative and positive), thereby demonstrating a void left by their static notions of freedom. It suggests the idea of marronage fills the conceptual chasm. The remainder of the chapter examines the advantages and shortcomings of Orlando Patterson’s thought, outlines recent developments in intellectual traditions rethinking political theory from modernity’s underside, and concludes with the book prospectus. (pages 3 - 26)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- Neil Roberts
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226201184.003.0002
[Hannah Arendt, disavowal, W.E.B. Du Bois, freedom, non-domination, non-sovereignty, Philip Pettit, political language, republicanism, slave agency]
This chapter begins with an analysis of two republican notions of freedom, the first articulated by Hannah Arendt: freedom in the founding of non-sovereign human action; and the second developed by Philip Pettit: the concept of freedom as non-domination. It outlines the claims of each while highlighting the locus of their respective disavowals of slavery and slave agency. Disavowal herein refers to a simultaneous double movement with traumatic consequences: an acknowledgment and a denial of an event. The second republican ideal does not hide the importance of slavery to freedom in the Roman tradition it seeks to revive. It makes a point to address slavery explicitly in a manner the first notion fails to articulate. Strict doctrinaire adherents of these two systems nevertheless disavow the experiences, thoughts, and agency of slaves, and this act unites them. After explaining the adverse effects of disavowal, the next section turns to the meaning of slave agency and employs the work of W.E.B. Du Bois. More than the rest of the book, chapter one is theme-centered with authors invoked insofar as they describe the role of political language and problem of disavowal that we must eliminate to explain sufficiently the idea of freedom. (pages 27 - 50)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

Part II: Slave Theorists of Freedom

- Neil Roberts
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226201184.003.0003
[autobiographical slave narrative, comparative freedom, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Angela Y. Davis, Frederick Douglass, flight, freedom, fugitivity, Haiti, slavery]
This chapter examines the work of Frederick Douglass to illustrate a theorist who supports the claim that freedom must be understood in relation to slavery, but does so in ways that still remains insufficient in describing freedom. Douglass’s prime significance is detailing, with painstaking precision, the value of experience. For Douglass, it is our mutating struggles and assertions in the face of enslavement that offer context to the meanings of the free life and its betrayal. Chapter two provides an exegesis of Douglass’s middle autobiographical slave narrative, the text in which Douglass supports this position through developing the concept of comparative freedom. The analysis of this book is mediated by inquiry into the writings of African-American thinker Angela Y. Davis, the British Romanticist poet-philosopher Samuel Taylor Coleridge, and the hemispheric influence of the elder Douglass, particularly the period of the early postcolonial Haitian state. This makes more apparent the stakes of understanding fugitivity and acts of marronage in revolutionary Saint-Domingue (colonial Haiti) during the previous decades. (pages 53 - 88)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- Neil Roberts
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226201184.003.0004
[Code Noir, freedom, French Declaration, grand marronage, Haitian Revolution, juridical paradox, petit marronage, slavery, sovereign marronage, Toussaint L’Ouverture]
This is the first of two chapters exploring the Haitian Revolution, the only known successful human slave revolution. Both chapters highlight the value of marronage for our modern political vocabulary by redefining its conventional usage so as to delineate freedom’s meaning in the revolution and to present freedom as marronage as a heuristic device useful to political theorists working in multiple geopolitical contexts. Chapter three examines two central Francophone documents of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries: 1) Code Noir, 2) French Declaration. Examination of their articles uncovers a juridical paradox unresolved by the revolution’s beginning. The chapter outlines thereafter three types of marronage (petit, grand, sovereign) that serve as a response to questions left unanswered hitherto in the book. Its crux is inquiry into the benefits and limitations of sovereign marronage and sovereign marronage’s manifestation in the figure of Toussaint L’Ouverture. It challenges enduring rhetoric in the popular imagination that collapses into one Toussaint’s freedom and all the principles forged during the Haitian revolution. The last section posits that Toussaint’s vision of the future is not the only notion of flight operative in the Saint-Domingue uprising. (pages 89 - 112)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- Neil Roberts
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226201184.003.0005
[constitutionalism, Edwidge Danticat, Jean-Jacques Dessalines, Franz Fanon, freedom, Haitian Revolution, slave revolution, naming, sociogenic marronage, vèvè architectonic]
This chapter deciphers principles developed during the Haitian Revolution by slave masses in flight. Its twofold objectives are a refutation of scholarship reducing the notions of freedom in the revolution to Toussaint’s vision; and explanation of the transhistorical, macropolitical, sociogenic conception of flight. Prior interpretations of marronage and the revolution describe flight while reifying a long-standing false binary in studies of slave societies: flight or structural reordering, whereby acts of flight are separated from investigations into revolutionary politics. The chapter argues sociogenic marronage allows us finally to discern how revolutions are themselves moments of flight ushering in new orders. Frantz Fanon’s philosophy illuminates facets of the sociogenic and reaffirms the importance of the psychological to the lived experience of freedom. Sociogenic marronage has four core principles: 1) naming, 2) imagined blueprints of freedom [vèvè architectonics], 3) the state of society, and 4) constitutionalism. Examination of Jean-Jacques Dessalines’s Declaration of Independence, the activities of slaves, Haiti’s 1805 Constitution, and an Edwidge Danticat short story vis-à-vis these principles underscore revolution’s relation to flight. It also highlights an adage of marronage philosophy: the ability of individuals to become free and to exit from that condition is fundamental to the human condition. (pages 113 - 138)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

Part III: Freedom as Marronage in Late ModernIty

- Neil Roberts
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226201184.003.0006
[becoming, creolization, freedom, Édouard Glissant, late modernity, marronage, philosophy of history, refugee, resistance, slavery]
This chapter examines Édouard Glissant’s thought within the wider discourses on creolization and creolizing political theory. It also marks a shift in the book to describing marronage’s relevance for late modernity. The chapter provides a philosophical reading of two Glissant texts (one novel, one essay collection) from his early and middle period that engage historical and imaginative forms of marronage. By exploring types of marronage in these works Glissant develops original concepts framing what the chapter contends is Glissant’s four-stage blueprint for sociogenic marronage: 1) rearticulating a philosophy of history, 2) retour (reversion/return) and détour (diversion/detour), 3) resistance, and 4) Antillanité (Caribbeanness). The chapter subsequently explores Glissant’s use of the rhizome idea and how lines of flight explain modes of marronage as an economy of survival, state of being, and condition of becoming, whether through fleeting fugitive acts, attempts at liberation, or the constitution of freedom. The implications of Glissant’s conception of marronage for contemporary debates over France’s commemoration of abolition, the Arab Spring, and relation between mainland France and French overseas départements including Martinique are addressed. The ending briefly discusses immigration politics and the figure of the refugee-immigrant as a late modern maroon. (pages 141 - 172)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- Neil Roberts
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226201184.003.0007
[dread, freedom, globalization, love, marronage, political language, reasoning, Rastafari, Peter Tosh, unfreedom]
This chapter broadens discourse on marronage through exploration into a late modern maroon movement: Rastafari. Rastafari speech acts inform its interpretation of freedom and the evolving disposition of its members towards the state. The chapter begins with reflection on Peter Tosh’s lyrical commentary on flight, temporality, and revolution. Elucidation of Tosh’s lament on the inability of masses globally to understand marronage and acknowledge a singular philosophical worldview shaping orders of unfreedom precedes the brief overview of core Rastafari tenets. The description of Rastafari livity (way of life) includes explanation of its unique political language and preoccupations: Babylon, Zion, dread, love, reasoning reparations, repatriation, unfreedom, and freedom. The chapter argues globalization and doctrinal transformations among branches of Rastafari in Jamaica, the Caribbean, and across the world have led to shifts in Rastafari beliefs on the nature of flight (physical and spiritual), itself representation of debates on flight addressed throughout the book. For these reasons, it asserts that the ongoing benefits and challenges of Rastafari present us with a rubric to appreciate freedom’s meaning and why marronage still matters. (pages 173 - 182)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

Notes

Bibliography

Index