Hegel's Theory of Intelligibility
by Rocío Zambrana
University of Chicago Press, 2015
Cloth: 978-0-226-28011-0 | Electronic: 978-0-226-28025-7
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226280257.001.0001
ABOUT THIS BOOKAUTHOR BIOGRAPHYREVIEWSTABLE OF CONTENTS

ABOUT THIS BOOK

Hegel’s Theory of Intelligibility picks up on recent revisionist readings of Hegel to offer a productive new interpretation of his notoriously difficult work, the Science of Logic. Rocío Zambrana transforms the revisionist tradition by distilling the theory of normativity that Hegel elaborates in the Science of Logic within the context of his signature treatment of negativity, unveiling how both features of his system of thought operate on his theory of intelligibility. 
           
Zambrana clarifies crucial features of Hegel’s theory of normativity previously thought to be absent from the argument of the Science of Logic—what she calls normative precariousness and normative ambivalence. She shows that Hegel’s theory of determinacy views intelligibility as both precarious, the result of practices and institutions that gain and lose authority throughout history, and ambivalent, accommodating opposite meanings and valences even when enjoying normative authority. In this way, Zambrana shows that the Science of Logic provides the philosophical justification for the necessary historicity of intelligibility. Intervening in several recent developments in the study of Kant, Hegel, and German Idealism more broadly, this book provides a productive new understanding of the value of Hegel’s systematic ambitions.

AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY

Rocío Zambrana is assistant professor of philosophy at the University of Oregon. 

REVIEWS

Hegel’s Theory of Intelligibility offers a brilliant and fresh account of Hegel’s doctrine of normativity. Taking as its central text one of Hegel’s most intricate works, the Science of Logic, the book revisits in a new light central concepts such as negativity, determinacy, and intelligibility, and connects Hegel’s dialectic to central issues of the contemporary philosophical debate. This is a successful effort in bringing Hegel’s idea of normative authority to the forefront.”
— Angelica Nuzzo, City University of New York

“This is a powerful book—masterful in its textual command, sharply argued, and well-positioned to intervene in the current revisionist debates regarding Hegel’s status as a ‘non-metaphysical,’ irreversibly post-Kantian, thinker. Zambrana engages Hegel’s modernity precisely at the point where his thought is usually taken to regress most. Far from serving up a sophisticated recycling of some kind of pre-critical rationalist ontology, as is so often assumed, the Science of Logic becomes the site where Hegel’s modernist credentials are most sharply revealed.”
— Rebecca Comay, University of Toronto

“The greatest virtue of Zambrana’s book is that it weaves together the best elements of interpretations that are often taken to be incompatible. The Hegel presented in these pages is both historicist and metaphysical, a theorist of both intelligibility and ‘normative ambivalence.’ By refocusing attention on Hegel’s modernism and on his conception of determinacy, Zambrana provides a new impetus for the renaissance in research on Hegel’s Science of Logic.”
— Dean Moyar, Johns Hopkins University

“Through a reinvigorating reading of the Science of Logic and other key texts, Zambrana not only convincingly challenges standard accounts of Hegel but also demonstrates the relevance of his most daunting work for contemporary reflections on the precarious nature of any determinate norm or practice”
— Karin de Boer, University of Leuven

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Acknowledgments

Abbreviations

- Rocío Zambrana
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226280257.003.0001
[modernity, analytic readings of Hegel, continental readings of Hegel, normative precariousness, normative ambivalence]
This Introduction explains that Hegel’s Theory of Intelligibility focuses on Hegel’s theoretical philosophy in order to show that what Hegel calls a “logic” is a theory of intelligibility that responds to the ambivalent development of modernity. It argues that Hegel’s modernism resides in his assessment of the truth of modernity revealed by its concrete development. It thereby introduces the two main concepts that the book develops--normative precariousness and normative ambivalence. It also clarifies that these two terms are a product of a pluralist strategy that does justice to strengths in contemporary analytic and continental readings of Hegel. (pages 1 - 14)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

Part 1. Hegel’s Logic Of Actualization

- Rocío Zambrana
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226280257.003.0002
[Kant, receptivity, spontaneity, transcendental unity of apperception, critique of pure reason]
In order to establish the strictures of the problem of synthesis that provide the starting point for Hegel’s theory of intelligibility, this chapter offers a reading of the Transcendental Aesthetic and the Transcendental Analytic in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. (pages 19 - 25)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- Rocío Zambrana
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226280257.003.0003
[Fichte, Wissenschaftslehre, absolute positing, opposition, limitation]
This chapter examines the 1797 Introductions to Fichte’s Wissenschaftslehre and part one of the 1794 version of the same work in order to specify Fichte’s engagement with Kant. It contextualizes Hegel’s solution to the Kantian problem of synthesis, since Hegel follows Fichte’s suggestion that determinacy is a matter of positing and transforms Fichtean opposition into determinate negation. (pages 26 - 35)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- Rocío Zambrana
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226280257.003.0004
[subjectivity, reason, Geist, history]
This chapter examines Hegel’s Faith and Knowledge, the Preface to the Phenomenology of Spirit, and the Preface to the Subjective Logic in the Science of Logic in order to assess Hegel’s critique of Kant and Fichte. It shows that these texts introduce Hegel’s notion of the idea as the concept that inherits Kantian synthesis via Fichtean positing. It also clarifies Hegel’s logic of actualization by discussing Hegel’s notions of reason, Geist, and history. (pages 36 - 50)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

Part 2. Hegel’s Critique of Reflection

- Rocío Zambrana
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226280257.003.0005
[doctrine of being, finitude, infinity, ideality]
This chapter argues that the opening of the Logic is not the beginning of a post-Kantian ontology, but the first move of Hegel’s systematic reductio of realism. I examine Hegel’s famous discussion of true infinity, and show that it is central to begin grasping his understanding of ideality as a question of normative authority. (pages 55 - 68)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- Rocío Zambrana
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226280257.003.0006
[doctrine of essence, actuality, external reflection, freedom, philosophy of right]
This chapter examines Hegel’s notion of actuality, which I analyze as the retrospective logic of positing-presupposing implicit in philosophies of reflection. This retrospective logic is central to actualization—a process of externalization and recollection distinctive of Hegelian mediation. It also draws implications of the reading of actuality offered for understanding the structure of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. (pages 69 - 86)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

Part 3. Hegel’s Idealism

- Rocío Zambrana
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226280257.003.0007
[judgment, syllogism, unity, division, determinate negation]
This chapter examines Hegel’s treatment of the concept, judgment, and syllogism, and argues that this treatment is a critique of notions of unity as exempt from negativity. Hegel’s discussion establishes that form is nothing but negativity. The negativity of form, in turn, shows the necessity of content. The chapter argues that this unity of form and content is key to Hegel’s understanding of intelligibility. (pages 93 - 114)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- Rocío Zambrana
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226280257.003.0008
[absolute idea, pure personality, absolute form, absolute method]
This chapter assesses Hegel’s insistence on the unity of the theoretical and the practical in the notion of the absolute idea. This insistence indicates the relation between determinacy and normative authority central to Hegel’s theory of intelligibility. It also shows that the absolute idea as method thematizes the work of dialectics and hence negativity central to Hegel’s understanding of the relation between ideality and reality. The chapter thereby draws important implications of negativity for the theory of normative authority offered under the banner of the absolute idea. Determinacy is precarious, since it depends on historically specific practices that maintain or debunk modes of intelligibility. But it is also ambivalent, since any normative distinction contains within itself both positive and negative valences thereby producing coextensive positive and negative effects even when enjoying normative authority. (pages 115 - 133)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- Rocío Zambrana
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226280257.003.0009
[comprehension, absolute geist, syllogisms of philosophy, critical history]
The book ends with a discussion of the three syllogisms of philosophy with which the Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences comes to a close. The Conclusion argues that the syllogisms of philosophy are three distinct combinations of logic, nature, and Geist. The combinations represent three distinct philosophical perspectives from which to understand the relation between logic, nature, and Geist. The syllogisms, however, also represent philosophical perspectives that allow a critical history of the development of a practice or institution, since they make possible different perspectives from which a normative commitment is assessed. The syllogisms make possible an assessment of the history of a normative commitment along with the awareness of the irreducible precariousness and ambivalence of any given commitment. (pages 134 - 140)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

Notes

Index