REVIEWS
“Replete with anecdotes, published quotes, reviews, plus documentation, this is a very readable, honest, informed—even scholarly—effort by Gluck in chronicling the influences, motives, and participants circa 1960 through early ’75 of Miles Davis and ‘. . . Other Revolutionary Bands.’ This will be an important contribution to music literature and study.”
— Stanley Cowell, pianist and composer
“Gluck’s The Miles Davis Lost Quintet and Other Revolutionary Ensembles goes the distance to dispel the simplistic notion that the ’70s was the decade of fusion and funk. Focusing on three ensembles whose innovations and influence exceeded their popularity is a brilliant move. While I could quibble with a few conclusions, Gluck expertly analyzes the music without ignoring the all-important political, cultural, social, and economic contexts in which the music was created—making this book invaluable.”
— Michael Cuscuna, cofounder of Mosaic Records
“This book presents a radical challenge to accepted portrayals of the networks that animated experimental music-making in the crucial decade of the 1970s. Moving beyond stereotypes of genre, Gluck lays out a compelling, cosmopolitan, yet intimate vision of the relationships among a set of highly innovative musicians who shaped the future of music itself.”
— George E. Lewis, author of A Power Stronger Than Itself: The AACM and American Experimental Music
“Gluck’s new work is written with much heart, warmth, and intelligence. I hope this starts a new wave of academic books that focus on good narrative, new concepts, and sophistication without having to fall into the academic jargon charade. Gluck explores cultural, sociological, and philosophical elements of some of the late sixties’ and early seventies’ most cutting edge groups, but in a way that is most essential: from a musical perspective. I am flattered to see a mention of my Listen to This: Miles Davis and Bitches Brew in the text, for I feel this new volume is a perfect complement, exploring many of Davis’s outlooks and sociological surroundings with a fresh and well developed perspective. I must admit, I know very little of some of the more avant-garde bands Gluck writes passionately about, but I enjoyed learning about them, and the whole New York loft scene of the seventies. Some of Gluck’s conclusions are new takes on matters, especially with the relationship with the avant-garde and Davis, which offer much to ponder and debate.”
— Victor Svorinich, Listen to This: Miles Davis and Bitches Brew
“The scholarship here is excellent. Documenting musical changes is difficult, and Gluck has to rely on a great deal of bootlegged material and also does a forensic recreation of some of Davis’s ‘Live’ albums—that were actually heavily produced—to understand what he and his quintet were working at. Gluck has scoured interviews—and done his own—to get a sense of the biographical and social issues at play. But unlike many other—most other—all other?—cultural criticism being put out today, he never reduces the art—the music-—to psychology and sociology. He understands the aesthetics, the music, as a thing unto itself, and tries hard to explain it. . . . Davis’s position as a famous bandleader allowed his musicians to experiment while still getting gigs, still producing albums. Circle and the Revolutionary Ensemble were in very different situations. . . . Gluck’s research and insight really pays off. . . . The research he did was small-scale and exacting, sketching networks of influence and explaining the development of a musical form that is too easily dismissed. And he left me wanting more.”
— Allmusic Books
“Gluck’s own expertise as a composer and musician work hand-in-hand with his natural inquisitiveness to uncover the inner creative method in a band that was literally reinventing their music on a gig-by-gig basis. In the process, Gluck perhaps reveals more about Davis’s techniques than previously understood. . . . In his examination of lesser-known groups like the Revolutionary Ensemble, Gluck illustrates both the Davis influence and the tenacious individualism of artists from the trumpeter’s sphere who were determined to follow their own best instincts. Though Gluck is an academician, his writing is accessible even at its most detailed. His insights are solidly supported by historical fact, quotes, and his firm grasp of the subject. As a result, The Miles Davis Lost Quintet and Other Revolutionary Ensembles plays out as a compelling narrative of artistic ambitions and human nature.”
— All About Jazz
“[Gluck] sees Davis as being in conversation with the free jazz of Ornette Coleman and John Coltrane, while creating a music—jazz rock—with much broader commercial appeal. The ‘musical economy’ is what separates The Lost Quintet from groups on the commercial margins like Circle and The Revolutionary Ensemble—to which Gluck devotes separate chapters. . . . His thesis is intriguing, and the book provides much of the material for addressing it. . . . He does show how The Lost Quintet was an important band in its own right, not just a transition to better known ensembles. The Miles Davis Lost Quintet and Other Revolutionary Ensembles raises tantalizing questions about a career that continues to fascinate.”
— The Wire
“One of the best things about this book is Gluck’s ability to connect all the dots: the relations between players and movements, between seemingly disparate musicians and the collective music they created, between what is seemingly lost and what deserves further examination. Gluck makes the case that often what should be most valued is also what is most hidden.”
— New York City Jazz Record
“Gluck’s analyses of the differences among the three groups, and of the underlying similarities that nevertheless made them commensurate, are astute and make accessible a music that can place great demands on the listener . . . Helps to situate these three groups precisely within a time that, in retrospect, was uniquely fecund.”
— Avant Music News
“Locates the music of his electric epoch within a historic continuum of exploratory jazz. ‘Electric Miles’ is the version who plugged in to the zeitgeist, traded his suits for hipster finery, and opened up his music to distortion and groove-based repetition, either transcending or dramatically repudiating (depending on your perspective) his roots in acoustic jazz.”
— Atlantic
“In discussion informed by interviews with many of the principals and by his own detailed analysis of recordings, Gluck examines each group and its music in depth.”
— Choice
“A look at the profoundly influential but hazily remembered period in the 1970s, after Miles went electric, when pretty much everything was possible, and pretty much everything happened.”
— Brooklyn Rail
"Overall his writing style aspires to, and regularly achieves, an informative blend of musical and cultural analysis that is meaningful to specialists without alienating non-musicians."
— Notes
“Gluck traces the history of the formidable Lost Quintet . . . that never found itself in the studio (there are only live recordings) and analyzes the Davisian businesses of the late 1960s with an eye to the free scene—that of the jazz warriors without chains, far from the architectural rigor of the colossus Miles.”
— Stefano Mannucci, Il Fatto Quotidiano (Translated from Italian)
“. . . deepens our understanding—with an always analytical and rigorous style . . .”
— Enrico Bettinello, Giornale della Musica (Translated from Italian)
A Top Music Book Pick
— Guido Michelone, Alias - Il Manifesto
“. . . [a] captivating investigation of some of the most experimental jazz instrumental ensembles . . . This is a book that tells how a specific, magnificent, revolutionary musical season of Miles Davis was inextricably connected with the historical period in which it was immersed.”
— Alessandro Rigolli, Gazzetta di Parma (Translated from Italian)
“The picture of events described by Gluck is very detailed and made up of both first-hand information and a careful examination of the extensive bibliographic apparatus. A reference work, written with sufficient clarity and undoubted critical spirit, of interest both for the neophyte and for those who in those years had the pleasure and the good fortune to listen live to the voices of a unique and no longer replicable musical season.”
— Piercarlo Poggio, The New Noise (Translated from Italian)
"[A book] highlighting the lines that connect Miles Davis and his musicians to the others of the time: the court of Ornette Coleman (whom Davis looked upon with calculated contempt), the radicality of John Coltrane's Ascension, the 'concrete composition' of the Gesang der Jünglinge in Stockhausen. And Leroy Jenkins playing violin in trio with the Revolutionary Ensemble . . ."
— Alberto Piccinini, Linus (Translated from Italian)
"[The Miles Davis Lost Quintet and Other Revolutionary Ensembles] evoke[s] burnt lives that have fueled the history, not only of music, but of the twentieth century."
— Domenica- Il Sole 24 ore (Translated from Italian)
“[Gluck is] the right person to reconstruct a little studied story in the history of jazz . . . this is not just another book on Miles Davis, but a comprehensive essay that documents a historical period of great general creativity."
— Mescaline (Translated from Italian)
“[Gluck] focuses on the divine trumpeter's fascination with the new sound front and on his singular ability to hold together the world of rock and the avant-garde . . ."
— Dagospia (Translated from Italian)
"[an] . . . original, intersectional approach and a beautiful fresco of the avant-garde of the time.”
— Il Manifesto (Translated from Italian)
"[This book is] an all-encompassing work on Davis and his time . . . and outlines the urban, political and social environment in which these extraordinary musicians moved.”
— Blow Up (Translated from Italian)
"Gluck's book tries to describe a complex season full of ideas. . .Perhaps the one in which jazz took its premise and promise to the extreme limit."
— Leggi Online (Translated from Italian)
“Gluck captures, from the brief period of the quintet, principles that become a sort of integrating background. These are useful to properly analyze an experience from which other musicians, all of them significant, drew upon … it is also striking how much the socio-political churning and sounds of industrialized urban civilization impacted the development of the composing and improvising of the groups and subsequently carried forward by members of that quintet.”
— Buscadero (Translated from Italian)
“This is an incredible book, of rare excellence and beauty… I have read books of music criticism but none have ever attained such beauty. Any palate will easily find itself in these pages: the super-technical one, the curious one, even the one who knows nothing of that period. Superbly direct, scrupulously translated, with perfect narrative timing, and never a cloying use of technical terms, this book also includes a very accurate analytical index and bibliography. It is not easy to call an essay exciting, but this it is.”
— MinimAL (Translated from Italian)
“With this book, the publisher Quodlibet has enriched the 'Chorus' series with a new, precious piece … Bob Gluck investigates this surprising sound season of Miles Davis without neglecting what, at the same time, was happening in the adjacent musical world, and never forgetting the equally surprising historical, political and social season to which Davis's experience was deeply anchored.”
— Strumenti & Musica (Translated from Italian)
“[The Miles Davis Lost Quintet and Other Revolutionary Ensembles] by Bob Gluck presents Miles by placing him at the center of a series of jazz revolutions.”
— la Lettura - Corriere della Sera (Translated from Italian)
“Late sixties, a magical period of youth culture: the great trumpeter Miles Davis transforms his jazz quintet pushing it towards funky and other youth genres. . . . Critic Bob Gluck explores its music, which turns out to be an extraordinary amalgam of electronics, metropolitan rhythms, collective interaction and pure experimentation. But Gluck goes further, showing the connective tissue between those ideas and the new avant-gardes."
— Umbria Journal (Translated from Italian)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Preface
Introduction - Bob Gluck
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226303390.003.0001
This chapter is available at:
https://academic.oup.com/chica...
1. Miles Goes Electric - Bob Gluck
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226303390.003.0002
[Miles Davis, jazz, electric, Chick Corea, Dave Holland, Jack DeJohnette, Wayne Shorter, jazz fusion, Ornette Coleman]
By 1969, a time of societal and culture change, protest, and exploration, jazz trumpeter Miles Davis had assimilated the innovations of Ornette Coleman and John Coltrane, in particular Coleman’s democratic principle. This was his use of collective intuition to guide musical form, what Chick Corea refers to as Davis’s “vaporizing themes and just going places.” Davis was simultaneously interested in connecting with younger Black audiences by strengthening the groove and rhythm within his music. His so-called “Lost” Quintet, the successor band to Davis’s 1960s Quintet, sought to balance the experimentation of Coleman and Coltrane with a deepened sense of the groove. With Wayne Shorter remaining from the Quintet, Davis constructed a new rhythm section capable of discovering this balance. In their first year, pianist Chick Corea, bassist Dave Holland, and drummer Jack DeJohnette begin to build new musical relationships and together chart an exciting, new course. (pages 7 - 34)
This chapter is available at:
https://academic.oup.com/chica...
2. “Bitches Brew,” in the Studio and on the Road - Bob Gluck
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226303390.003.0003
[Miles Davis, jazz, electric jazz, Chick Corea, Dave Holland, Jack DeJohnette, Wayne Shorter, jazz fusion]
In late August 1969, after touring Europe with his new quintet, Miles Davis assembled a larger studio ensemble built around his working band. The group included multiple keyboardists and percussionists, an electric guitarist, and pairs of reed players and bassists. The goal was to record Bitches Brew, an album of multi-layered collective improvisations based upon rhythmic vamps and simple thematic sketches. A formal structure emerged in post-production in the hands of producer Teo Macero. His compositional design was achieved through tape editing techniques that developed in experimental and rock music studios. The resulting form was quite different from the organic spontaneous musical processes of the touring band, for which the title track became a central improvisational vehicle. The treatment of the tune evolved in a manner that reflected evolving musical dynamics within the band between autumn 1969 and spring 1970, often taking audiences on a musical roller coaster that rendered every performance distinct. (pages 35 - 56)
This chapter is available at:
https://academic.oup.com/chica...
3. Anthony Braxton: Leroy Jenkins, Musica Elettronica Viva, and the “Peace Church” Concert - Bob Gluck
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226303390.003.0004
[Anthony Braxton, Leroy Jenkins, Ornette Coleman, Richard Teitelbaum, Frederic Rzewski, Alvin Curran, Chick Corea, Dave Holland, Jack DeJohnette, Barry Altschul]
In 1969, saxophonist Anthony Braxton and violinist Leroy Jenkins were Paris-bound, joining an exodus of Chicago-based Association for the Advancement of Creative Musicians members. While in Paris, friendships developed with Ornette Coleman who welcomed them to his New York loft Artists House upon their return to the United States. Braxton’s shared affinities with the improvisational collective Musica Elettronica Viva-- from John Cage to John Coltrane--led to a joint American tour. Braxton subsequently accompanied Miles Davis’s drummer Jack DeJohnette to hear Davis band members Chick Corea and Dave Holland with Barry Altschul at the Village Vanguard. This followed a concert in New York by Braxton, Jenkins and friends. After Braxton Braxton sat in the trio expanded to form Circle. (pages 57 - 78)
This chapter is available at:
https://academic.oup.com/chica...
4. Interlude: Musical Rumblings in Chelsea - Bob Gluck
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226303390.003.0005
[Warren Smith, Dave Liebman, jazz, Chick Corea, Dave Holland, Barry Altschul, Anthony Braxton, Leroy Jenkins, Ornette Coleman, circle]
While playing with Miles Davis, Chick Corea and Dave Holland lived in the same loft building in New York’s Chelsea neighborhood, where they began to play acoustic duets. They moved there at the suggestion of saxophonist Dave Liebman, whose loft became a musical center for exploratory young, mostly white, musicians playing in the cacophonous style of John Coltrane’s Ascension. The neighborhood was also home to a number of musician studios, notably Warren Smith’s Studio WIS. Liebman and his associates began to organize their activities under the banner of a collective they called Free Life Communications. Steve Grossman and other future Miles Davis band members participated in the jams, which led to programming concert events. Meanwhile, Corea and Holland recruited multidirectional drummer Barry Altschul to form an open improvisational acoustic trio, leading to their decision to leave the Miles Davis band. (pages 79 - 96)
This chapter is available at:
https://academic.oup.com/chica...
5. Miles Davis’s Increasingly Electric 1970, and a Reflection on His 1971–75 Bands - Bob Gluck
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226303390.003.0006
[Miles Davis, jazz, Chick Corea, Dave Holland, Jack DeJohnette, Wayne Shorter, Steve Grossman, Gary Bartz, jazz fusion]
Miles Davis’s desire for a more electric sound led the Fender Rhodes electric piano to become Chick Corea’s instrument in the “Lost” Quintet. Its greater volume and potential to create a wider range of sounds (with electronic processing) attracted Corea’s interest, although he remained ambivalent. Newly available synthesizers represent an interesting sonic parallel. The band’s sonic palate grew with the addition of percussionist Airto Moreira, bassist Dave Holland’s use of wah-wah electric bass, and finally Keith Jarrett’s arrival as a second electric keyboardist in April 1970. This electric aesthetic is exemplified in performances of “Bitches Brew” during the “Lost” band’s final months. In autumn 1970, the Davis band changed personnel with the departure of Corea and Holland, heading in a more funk-oriented direction, but one that never ceased to retain an air of experimentalism and surprise. (pages 97 - 112)
This chapter is available at:
https://academic.oup.com/chica...
6. Circle - Bob Gluck
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226303390.003.0007
[circle, Chick Corea, Dave Holland, Barry Altschul, Anthony Braxton, jazz]
The band Circle was born when saxophonist Anthony Braxton joined the Chick Corea, Dave Holland, Barry Altschul Trio. Their initial recording sessions in August 1970 were totally improvised. An improvisational model developed that featured close listening, an intuitive unfolding of musical form, changing moods and speeds of playing, stylistic and textural diversity, and a harmonic spectrum bridging tonality and atonality. Anthony Braxton’s wide breadth of reed instruments, from sopranino to contrabass saxophones, helped broaden the sound palate. Eventually, Circle developed a repertoire of compositions by band members and even jazz standards, used as jumping off points for open improvisation. Circle’s collectivity encompassed not only their music making, but also business operation and personal lives, as they traveled as a commune with family members. Continuing on the road through summer 1971, the band’s music faced opposition from jazz critics, particularly on the jazz club circuit. Following Circle’s demise, Corea formed the Brazilian-tinged Return to Forever, Holland and Altschul joined the Sam Rivers Trio and at times Anthony Braxton’s ensembles, bringing with them the profound musical growth that occurred during the Circle experience. (pages 113 - 132)
This chapter is available at:
https://academic.oup.com/chica...
7. The Revolutionary Ensemble - Bob Gluck
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226303390.003.0008
[revolutionary ensemble, Leroy Jenkins, Jerome Cooper, Sirone, New York, jazz]
When Chicago-born violinist Leroy Jenkins returned from a sojourn in Paris, he moved to New York. There, Jenkins formed a cooperative trio with bassist Sirone (Norris Jones) and drummer Jerome Cooper. In this leaderless band, individual and group configurations were malleable constructs, negotiated in the moment. Living in downtown New York, the Revolutionary Ensemble was part of an emerging musical culture known for its creativity but inability to gain commercial traction. Instead, informal venues arose in lofts such as Sam and Bea Rivers’ Studio Rivbea. The band rehearsed constantly but rarely performed in public during its early years. Still, the band developed a committed group of followers of their concerts, some of which were documented on recordings. A short-lived record contract with A&M Records, on its Horizon Jazz Series helped the trio gain recognition In the mid-1970s, when they began to play festivals. Disbanding in 1977, the band reunited in the early 2000s to revisit their “devil take care” approach to making music for the sheer joy of making music. (pages 133 - 148)
This chapter is available at:
https://academic.oup.com/chica...
8. Ornette Coleman’s Children: Comparisons and Contrasts Inside and Outside the Jazz Economy - Bob Gluck
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226303390.003.0009
[Miles Davis, music business, Chick Corea, circle, revolutionary ensemble, Barry Altschul, Anthony Braxton, Leroy Jenkins, Jerome Cooper, Sirone]
A panoply of musical ideas connect Miles Davis’s “Lost” Quintet, Circle, and the Revolutionary Ensemble. Linking these three bands as “children” of Ornette Coleman goes against the oft-told story of Bitches Brew being a weigh station en route to funk. In fact, all his 1970s bands balanced vamps with abstraction. Motivic development, texture and color, and intuitive group interaction represented the legacy of Ornette Coleman’s innovations, shared with Cecil Taylor and John Coltrane. Comparisons between the “Lost” and other open improvisational groups become more complex in the context of the music business. The Miles Davis name was highly marketable irrespective of the particular music his bands played. Neither Circle nor the Revolutionary Ensemble had access to major label record contracts, a steady stream of releases, or well-staffed concert tours, coupled with a promotional budget that only a major corporation could bring to bear. It is a wonder that Miles Davis was able to successfully navigate the nexus between multiple musical works, but equally significant that creative groups further off the grid could sustain their work in light of the two-tiered musical economy. (pages 149 - 164)
This chapter is available at:
https://academic.oup.com/chica...
Appendix 1: Timeline
Appendix 2: Reconsidering Miles Davis at Fillmore: Live at the Fillmore East (1970) in Light of Miles at the Fillmore (2014)
Appendix 3: Circle’s Performance of Its Members’ Compositions
Notes
References
Discography
Index