The Rhapsodes How 1940s Critics Changed American Film Culture
by David Bordwell
University of Chicago Press, 2016
Cloth: 978-0-226-35217-6 | Paper: 978-0-226-35220-6 | Electronic: 978-0-226-35234-3
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226352343.001.0001
ABOUT THIS BOOKAUTHOR BIOGRAPHYREVIEWSTABLE OF CONTENTS

ABOUT THIS BOOK

Pauline Kael, Andrew Sarris, and Roger Ebert were three of America’s most revered and widely read film critics, more famous than many of the movies they wrote about. But their remarkable contributions to the burgeoning American film criticism of the 1960s and beyond were deeply influenced by four earlier critics: Otis Ferguson, James Agee, Manny Farber, and Parker Tyler. Throughout the 1930s and ’40s, Ferguson, Agee, Farber, and Tyler scrutinized what was on the screen with an intensity not previously seen in popular reviewing. Although largely ignored by the arts media of the day, they honed the sort of serious discussion of films that would be made popular decades later by Kael, Sarris, Ebert and their contemporaries.
           
With The Rhapsodes, renowned film scholar and critic David Bordwell—an heir to both those legacies—restores to a wider audience the work of Ferguson, Agee, Farber, and Tyler, critics he calls the “Rhapsodes” for the passionate and deliberately offbeat nature of their vernacular prose. Each broke with prevailing currents in criticism in order to find new ways to talk about the popular films that contemporaries often saw at best as trivial, at worst as a betrayal of art. Ferguson saw in Hollywood an engaging, adroit mode of popular storytelling. Agee sought in cinema the lyrical epiphanies found in romantic poetry. Farber, trained as a painter, brought a pictorial intelligence to bear on film. A surrealist, Tyler treated classic Hollywood as a collective hallucination that invited both audience and critic to find moments of subversive pleasure. With his customary clarity and brio, Bordwell takes readers through the relevant cultural and critical landscape and considers the critics’ writing styles, their conceptions of films, and their quarrels. He concludes by examining the profound impact of Ferguson, Agee, Farber, and Tyler on later generations of film writers.

The Rhapsodes allows readers to rediscover these remarkable critics who broke with convention to capture what they found moving, artful, or disappointing in classic Hollywood cinema and explores their robust—and continuing—influence.

AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY

David Bordwell is the Jacques Ledoux Professor of Film Studies Emeritus at the University of Wisconsin–Madison. With Kristin Thompson, he is coauthor of Film Art: An Introduction and Film History: An Introduction and the blog Observations on Film Art, which can be found at http://www.davidbordwell.net/blog.

REVIEWS

“Bordwell pinpoints a time in movie history when a whole new dialogue was opened up between viewers and filmmakers, and he does it with a deep love of not just pictures, but, especially, of words. The writing floats and bounces, there’s jaunt and inspiration here, as good as the best work of the critics he writes about.”
— David Koepp, screenwriter, Jurassic Park and War of the Worlds; director, Ghost Town and Premium Rush

“In this wonderfully engaging history, Bordwell looks at the DNA of American film criticism to show how four film-lovers-turned-movie-critics helped lead a revolution in contemporary thought. Going wide and deep, with expressive detail and unforced historical sweep, Bordwell shows how the four men he calls the Rhapsodes—Otis Ferguson, James Agee, Manny Farber and Parker Tyler— by taking movies seriously (if rarely themselves), made an argument for the movies that demolished old high-low snobberies and ushered in a new age of cinephilia. Bordwell, one of our greatest film historians and theorists, proves yet again that he’s also one of our greatest critics.”
— Manohla Dargis, co-chief film critic, New York Times

"This marvelously readable, refreshing book is both enlightening and hugely entertaining. Bordwell, our preeminent bridge between scrupulous film scholarship and lively, accessible prose style, has outdone himself with this much-needed study of four pioneering film critics. Most impressive is the generous spirit with which he appreciates the characteristics and virtues of each writer, who are very different one from another (and from himself), while simultaneously setting their accomplishments in a broader context of the history of American criticism and popular taste. In doing so, he shows he is their peer as well as their grateful inheritor."
— Phillip Lopate

Bordwell pays homage to a generation of critics lost to time and reintroduces them to a modern audience—those who read this book will be grateful.”
— Library Journal

“Illuminating. . . . Bordwell probes each critic’s work and shows how they took mainstream Hollywood film, and writing about it, seriously.”
— Publishers Weekly

The Rhapsodes is imminently readable, a slim volume that slips in your backpack just as easily as it slips into serious film discourse.”
— Isthmus

“If you have a driving or even just a drive-by interest in arts criticism, film writing and the love we share for all kinds of movies, The Rhapsodes is a swift, terrific read.”
— Michael Phillips, Chicago Tribune

“The primary pleasure of this book comes from Bordwell’s appreciation of the originality of these writers, the way each of them constructed a distinctive prose whose mixing of unlike elements calls to mind that homemade world that the critic Hugh Kenner discerned in the poetry of William Carlos Williams and Wallace Stevens. There is real enthusiasm, and valuable guidance, in Bordwell’s tour, as he plucks out particularly lively or audacious passages. He walks us through the literature with an admirably light step, pointing out highlights and connecting dots, and, as he goes, filling in some of the background of the 1940s intellectual milieu in which these men worked. . . . The Rhapsodes elicits an awareness of just how much expressive energy was pouring out on the movie screens of America in pictures that many continued to regard as disposable time killers.”
— Geoffrey O'Brien, Artforum

“While each of the subjects of The Rhapsodes has come in for their appreciation in turn at one time or another, Bordwell’s unique accomplishment is to situate them within the larger context of American arts journalism. . . . As one reasonably well-acquainted with all of Bordwell’s Rhapsodes, much information here was new to me. . . . There are also Bordwell’s typically lucid close reads of each writer’s idiosyncratic style. . . . This slim volume is worth an even dozen critic memoirs—and in recounting Ferguson’s call to arms for a film criticism worthy of its subject, it sounds a reveille of its own.”
— Nick Pinkerton, Sight & Sound

“In The Rhapsodes, [Bordwell’s] applied his sharp analytic eye not just to the arguments put forth by his four subjects but also—and this may be the most fun part of the book—to their prose.”
— Fandor

“Highly entertaining. . . . [Bordwell] is equally attentive to the four writers’ idiosyncratic prose styles and to the strategies they used to argue that mainstream movies were an art form worthy of serious study.”
— Library of America

"The Rhapsodes, besides being a pleasure to read, makes a sophisticated contribution to the study of film criticism."
— Cineaste

TABLE OF CONTENTS

- David Bordwell
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226352343.003.0001
[Pauline Kael, Andrew Sarris, Roger Ebert, film criticism, Hollywood]
During the 1960s and 1970s, film criticism became a respected form of arts journalism, with Pauline Kael and Andrew Sarris emerging as major tastemakers. As American cinema broke with its studio heritage and as foreign films commanded intellectuals’ attention, film critics gained new stature. Audiences who found Bergman and Fellini to be masters were ready to take critics seriously too. These writers, however, now stood revealed as the inheritors of a tradition that had begun in the 1940s with reviewers who established a new tenor for American film criticism. Those reviewers—most famously James Agee but also Otis Ferguson, Manny Farber, and Parker Tyler—provided new ways to think and write about popular cinema. (pages 1 - 9)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- David Bordwell
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226352343.003.0002
[Otis Ferguson, James Agee, Manny Farber, Parker Tyler, Walt Disney, film criticism, rhetoric]
Four major American critics of the 1940s brought a new verve to film criticism. Writers for large-circulation intellectual weeklies, they were able to propose vigorous new ideas about American cinema. They achieved these by a close attention to the details of acting, staging, lighting, editing, and other creative dimensions. Just as important, they attracted readers with vivacious, sometimes wildly unorthodox prose styles. Fresh twists of grammar, unexpected word choice, and every resource of rhetoric, from hyperbole to understatement, were eagerly taken up by critics who were, in several ways, opposed to the literary establishment ruled by more temperate and judicious (hence boring) arbiters of taste. (pages 10 - 19)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- David Bordwell
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226352343.003.0003
[Otis Ferguson, James Agee, Manny Farber, Parker Tyler, Theodor Adorno, David Reisman, popular culture, mass culture, Hollywood, American communism, Partisan Review]
Two issues dominated intellectual culture of the Rhapsodes’ period: Left-wing politics and the power of popular culture. The four critics considered in the book did not push a political line, and their tastes were not dictated by ideology. While Marxists considered popular culture as a mechanism for distracting and misleading the masses, these critics responded directly to the appeals and faults of the films before them. They thrust back more vigorously at the emerging school of sociological criticism that saw the movie screen as a neutral backdrop for national character or a miasmic Zeitgeist. Their close attention to the films gave them a better sense of what Hollywood could do than did the rote denunciations of intellectuals who saw cinema as merely an arm of the “culture industry.” (pages 20 - 34)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- David Bordwell
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226352343.003.0004
[film criticism, Hollywood, Otis Ferguson, swing music, The New Republic, rhetoric]
Otis Ferguson died in the Merchant Marine soon after America entered the war, but he became something of a model for the three other critics who followed. An unorthodox intellectual, he wrote slangy, vivacious reviews of books, films, and jazz from 1934 on. He celebrated the smoothness of Hollywood film style, which had managed to integrate energetic visuals with lively dialogue. As a writer fascinated with the technique of his favorite swing musicians, he became ever more interested in the craft of filmmaking. In his last pieces he began to argue that critical analysis and judgment could be deepened through acquaintance with practical creative choices made by filmmakers. (pages 35 - 58)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- David Bordwell
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226352343.003.0005
[James Agee, Let Us Now Praise Famous Men, poetry, film criticism, Hollywood, Dwight Macdonald, Charles Chaplin]
A poet and novelist, Agee brought a literary sensibility to film journalism. His Let Us Now Praise Famous Men, an unorthodox piece of reportage, had brought him some notice, but his reviews for THE NATION and, anonymously, for TIME made him widely read. An irrepressible Romantic, Agee looked to cinema for poetic epiphanies. Like his peers, he concentrated on details of presentation, hoping to find there a moment of emotional revelation. Almost morbidly self-aware, he also dramatized in his reviews the difficulty—intellectual and ethical—of arriving at a fair judgment of even a minor movie. Sometimes derided for his equivocations, he is treated here as a serious thinker who presented himself as supersensitive to every aspect of a film, or of everyday life. (pages 59 - 81)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- David Bordwell
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226352343.003.0006
[Manny Farber, Hollywood, Clement Greenberg, abstract expressionism, Hans Hofmann, negative space]
Farber came to film reviewing from art criticism and a training as a carpenter and painter. Today the most revered critic of the 1940s-1950s, he wrote with zany energy, mixing slang and high-cultural references in a breathless momentum. He was able to isolate a film’s most arresting moments, often of a purely visual nature, and he argued that Hollywood’s B films often showed more creativity than did its A products. He helped create a climate of acceptance of the hard-driving action films of the period, but less often noticed is the way he found Hollywood a revival of traditions of visual storytelling that were denigrated in the gallery scene of his day, which deplored “illusion” and “illustration.” He became a huge influence on film criticism after 1970. (pages 82 - 110)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- David Bordwell
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226352343.003.0007
[Parker Tyler, Charles Chaplin, Sigmund Freud, surrealism, homosexuality, film criticism]
A literary dandy in the Wilde-Cocteau tradition, a surrealist fellow-traveler, Tyler wrote for more esoteric journals than did his counterparts. These venues allowed him to dwell on aspects of the films in an intensely focused manner, and he was permitted to go to extremes of both style and judgment. Tyler saw Hollywood not as a storytelling tradition but a phantasmagoric realm that generated fantasies through a constant play among spectacle, technique, and intrinsically disturbing material. He treated popular films as a kind of “super-art” that went beyond traditional aesthetics into dream and ritual. His prose, alternately slangy and recondite, is an adventure in unexpected juxtapositions of the sort he found in the films themselves. He was also not averse to finding his own pet fantasies on the screen. (pages 111 - 132)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- David Bordwell
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226352343.003.0008
[Otis Ferguson, James Agee, Manny Farber, Parker Tyler, avant-garde cinema, pop art, camp, film criticism]
This chapter traces the heritage of the four critics across the years up to the 1980s. Ferguson, the earliest of the critics considered, was the last to be rediscovered, after celebrity criticism of the Kael-Sarris variety took over film reviewing. Agee’s collection, AGEE ON FILM, was the first major collection of a critic’s writing and, because he won the Pulitzer prize posthumously for A DEATH IN THE FAMILY, the anthology garnered enormous praise. It led other critics to collect their reviews as well. Manny Farber created his own collection, strategically selecting items to create a certain persona for himself—one based on his more arcane 1960s writings for film and art journals. Parker Tyler wrote prolifically about non-Hollywood film (chiefly foreign cinema and avant-garde film) and returned only to Hollywood movies to point out that the sexual subtexts he had revealed had come to the surface, rather blatantly. The same period revealed a growing awareness that these critics had been pioneers in arts journalism, and that the new trends owed a great deal to them. (pages 133 - 142)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

Acknowledgments

Sources

Index