U.S. Engineering in a Global Economy
edited by Richard B. Freeman and Hal Salzman
University of Chicago Press, 2018
Cloth: 978-0-226-46833-4 | Electronic: 978-0-226-46847-1
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226468471.001.0001
ABOUT THIS BOOKAUTHOR BIOGRAPHYTABLE OF CONTENTS

ABOUT THIS BOOK

Since the late 1950s, the engineering job market in the United States has been fraught with fears of a shortage of engineering skill and talent. U.S. Engineering in a Global Economy brings clarity to issues of supply and demand in this important market. Following a general overview of engineering-labor market trends, the volume examines the educational pathways of undergraduate engineers and their entry into the labor market, the impact of engineers working in firms on productivity and innovation, and different dimensions of the changing engineering labor market, from licensing to changes in demand and guest worker programs.

The volume provides insights on engineering education, practice, and careers that can inform educational institutions, funding agencies, and policy makers about the challenges facing the United States in developing its engineering workforce in the global economy.

AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY

Richard B. Freeman is the Herbert Ascherman Professor of Economics at Harvard University and is a research associate of the National Bureau of Economic Research. Hal Salzman is professor of planning and public policy at the Edward J. Bloustein School and senior faculty fellow at the John J. Heldrich Center for Workforce Development at Rutgers University.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Acknowledgment

- Richard B. Freeman, Hal Salzman
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226468471.003.0001
[engineering labor force;engineer supply and demand;engineer demographics;engineering education;productivity;innovation;H-1B guestworkers;engineering licensing]
The National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) has a long history analyzing the science and engineering workforce, and U.S. Engineering in a Global Economy follows the NBER tradition of quantitative analysis of the demand and supply sides of the engineering job market in the United States. Many of the chapters use novel data or approaches to examine engineering education, practice, and careers in ways designed to inform science and engineering educational institutions, funding agencies, and policymakers about the challenges and opportunities for developing and employing engineers in ways that can most efficaciously contribute to the innovation driving modern economic growth. (pages 1 - 10)
This chapter is available at:
    University of Chicago Press
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- Daniel Kuehn, Hal Salzman
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226468471.003.0002
[engineering labor force;engineer supply and demand;engineer demographics;engineering education;STEM]
Chapter one sets the stage for the rest of the book with a review of the engineering labor force, focusing on the employment, salary, and career trajectories of graduates that obtain engineering degrees and work in the field. Lacking a single comprehensive data source on engineers, this chapter draws on a wide variety of longitudinal career data and establishment-based employment and earnings data available from different government surveys of scientists, engineers, and employers and on education administrative data on the supply of engineers coming from U.S. universities to Census survey data on the numbers from overseas. It disaggregates engineering into major subfields, whose employment differs sufficiently to face different supply and demand conditions. (pages 11 - 46)
This chapter is available at:
    University of Chicago Press
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

Part I. Engineering Education

- Shannon K. Gilmartin, anthony lising antonio, Samantha R. Brunhaver, Helen L. Chen, Sheri D. Sheppard
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226468471.003.0003
[engineering education;engineering student career plans;early career pathway;multi-level modeling;URM women;socioeconomic background;between-major differences;engineering labor market;institutional characteristics]
This chapter examines undergraduate engineering students’ career plans, and the environments and experiences that influence their intentions to enter the engineering profession. We augment survey data collected from over 2,000 engineering students with data from three national sources. Our results indicate, first, that a substantial majority of engineering students are not committed to an exclusively engineering career. Second, students with engineering focused plans have distinctive profiles compared with their peers; namely, they are more likely to major in civil/environmental engineering, report higher intrinsic motivation to study engineering, have higher levels of involvement in their coursework, and have lower levels of professional/interpersonal confidence. Third, one’s expected engineering salary modestly differentiates engineering focused students from non-engineering focused ones. Finally, institutional characteristics are associated with students’ engineering career plans, and socioeconomic background may influence plans through the types of institutions at which higher and lower SES students differentially enroll. Implications for educational research and practice are discussed. (pages 49 - 86)
This chapter is available at:
    University of Chicago Press
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- Catherine J. Weinberger
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226468471.003.0004
[education;college major;college;black;African American;engineering;computer science;STEM;HBCU;earnings inequality]
Throughout the 1970s and 1980s, U.S. institutions of higher education began to address long-standing patterns of exclusion. Initial efforts to improve the access of black students to engineering education focused on six historically black engineering colleges, and evolved into a truly nationwide movement. Later, a larger group of Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) expanded educational opportunities in engineering, computer science and other technical fields, "to prepare their students for expanded career choices." Geographic and institutional features of the higher education infrastructure led to differential impacts of these policies on students born in different states. A data panel assembled for the project links changes in educational opportunities to current outcomes. The panel includes more than 30 years of complete counts of the number of bachelor's degrees conferred in each field by each U.S. institution of higher education (collected by the U.S. Department of Education and the Engineering Manpower Commission), merged to current labor force data. These data facilitate description of the geography and timing of changes in opportunities for black college students to choose engineering or computer science college majors, and current labor market outcomes among those born in the right place and time to pursue careers in these fields. (pages 87 - 128)
This chapter is available at:
    University of Chicago Press
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- Samantha R. Brunhaver, Russell F. Korte, Stephen R. Barley, Sheri D. Sheppard
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226468471.003.0005
[engineering education;professional practice;school-to-work transition;engineering students;new engineers;workplace;longitudinal;knowledge and skills;preparedness;qualitative interviews]
This chapter examines the disjunctures between engineering education and practice to identify ways to better connect the two. Qualitative interviews with engineering students and new engineers are used to compare the knowledge and skills that engineers learn in school and those that they learn on the job. Our findings demonstrate that, while engineering practice requires the integration of several kinds of knowledge and skills, engineering education focuses mainly on the technical side. Engineers learn most professional and organizational knowledge and skills only after entering the workforce. Even when they are exposed to professional skills such as teamwork and communication in school, they may not see true representations of what these skills look like on the job or consider the work as “real engineering”. The results suggest deficiencies in the current model of engineering education that constrain its ability to produce effective graduates. Implications for engineering education, professional practice, and educational research are discussed. (pages 129 - 164)
This chapter is available at:
    University of Chicago Press
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

Part II. Engineering and Innovation

- Erling Barth, James C. Davis, Richard B. Freeman, Andrew J. Wang
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226468471.003.0006
[productivity;technological change;science based;occupation;earnings;research and development;innovation]
This paper uses linked establishment-firm-employee data to examine the relationship between the scientists and engineers proportion (SEP) of employment, and productivity, and labor earnings. We show that: (1) most scientists and engineers in industry are employed in establishments producing goods or services, and do not perform research and development (R&D); (2) productivity is higher in manufacturing establishments with higher SEP, and increases with increases in SEP; (3) employee earnings are higher in manufacturing establishments with higher SEP, and increase substantially for employees who move to establishments with higher SEP, but only modestly for employees within an establishment when SEP increases in the establishment. The results suggest that the work of scientists and engineers in goods and services producing establishments is an important pathway for increasing productivity and earnings, separate and distinct from the work of scientists and engineers who perform R&D. (pages 167 - 192)
This chapter is available at:
    University of Chicago Press
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- Susan Helper, Jennifer Kuan
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226468471.003.0007
[engineering;auto industry;supply chain;innovation;knowledge overlap;incremental innovation;new product innovation;interorganizational relationship]
The questions addressed in this volume are motivated by the recognition that engineers play an important role in generating innovation and economic growth. In this chapter, we seek to offer some description of engineering work by looking in detail at a specific manufacturing industry—firms that supply automakers—to gain insight into how engineers create innovation. Autos account for 5% of US GDP and in 2011, 70% of auto suppliers contributed design effort, a task typically performed by engineers, making the auto supply chain an important context in which to study engineering and innovation. Some highlights from our original survey data include a wide range in terms of size and strategies of supply chain companies; a majority was small- to medium-sized, often family-owned. We observed barriers to patenting for manufacturing firms' developing process rather than product innovations. And interviews revealed the importance of customers for the innovative efforts of supplier firms. Certain Japanese customers were preferred because they shared expertise and helped suppliers improve, while other, American, customers were viewed as having unreasonable demands for regular, incremental price reductions and did not offer technical or organizational support. (pages 193 - 214)
This chapter is available at:
    University of Chicago Press
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

Part III. Engineers and Labor Markets

- Yoon Sun Hur, Morris M. Kleiner, Yingchun Wang
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226468471.003.0008
[wages;engineers;occupational licensing;labor markets and regulation;wage effects;employment effects;occupational regulation;employment]
Our paper presents an analysis of the role of occupational licensing requirements on the labor market for civil, electrical, and industrial engineers. These groups of engineers represent the largest number of engineers that are covered by occupational licensing statutes in the United States. We initially trace the historical evolution of licensing for engineers. Second, we present a theoretical rationale for the role of government in the labor market for the occupation. In the model, the government’s ability to control supply through licensing restrictions and the pass rate could limit the number of engineers, which may drive up wages. We then estimate a panel data model for the engineers in our sample using the American Community Survey and regulatory statutes. Our estimates show a small and often insignificant influence of occupational licensing on both wages and hours worked in a variety of specifications and sensitivity analysis tests. The current modest stage of occupational regulation for engineers appears to be too diffuse to influence wages and the number of hours worked in the occupation. (pages 217 - 242)
This chapter is available at:
    University of Chicago Press
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- Leonard Lynn, Hal Salzman, Daniel Kuehn
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226468471.003.0009
[demand and supply of engineers;petroleum engineering;shortages of engineers;U.S. education system;high skill labor markets]
This chapter examines a natural experiment in science and engineering labor market elasticity, providing an empirical study of the responsiveness of supply to demonstrated demand of employers. U.S. petroleum engineering expanded in the 1970s and then stabilized for three decades. By the early 2000s, this cohort was retiring at the same time there were sharp increases in oil prices and new exploration. Together, these factors led to dramatic increases in hiring and in starting salaries.In response, U.S. universities increased petroleum graduates fourfold over the decade 2003 to 2013, almost entirely of U.S. students. In this study of petroleum engineering demand and supply, the authors provide empirical analysis that addresses broader questions about the capacity of the education system to meet industry demand for highly skilled labor. It suggests that highly skilled labor markets are responsive to demand that results in wage increases, and universities are able to expand capacity, even in highly specialized and skilled areas such as petroleum engineering. (pages 243 - 262)
This chapter is available at:
    University of Chicago Press
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- Ron Hira
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226468471.003.0010
[immigration;H-1B visa;offshoring;outsourcing;guest workers]
The H-1B visa is a large-scale guest worker program that grants high-skilled foreigners temporary work authorization in the United States. It is an employer-driven program, meaning that an employer must sponsor the H-1B visa for the worker. Further, employers have the discretion to sponsor an H-1B worker for lawful permanent residence. Many policymakers have highlighted sponsorship for permanent residence as a key feature of the H-1B program because it has become a significant source of employment-based permanent immigration for high-skilled foreigners. The paper examines sponsorship for permanent residence by the top H-1B employers, which have received a large share of the visas in recent years. Clear patterns emerge from the data, with some firms sponsoring large shares of H-1B workers for permanent residence, whereas, other firms sponsor few or none of its H-1B workers. Those firms with high rates of permanent resident sponsorship tend to make products, while firms sponsoring at low rates employ an offshore outsourcing business model. Other important patterns emerge. Offshore outsourcing firms tend to pay H-1B workers significantly lower wages, their H-1B workers have lower educational attainment, and the H-1B workers mostly come from one country, India. (pages 263 - 284)
This chapter is available at:
    University of Chicago Press
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

Contributors

Author Index

Subject Index