Animal Labor and Colonial Warfare
by James L. Hevia
University of Chicago Press, 2018
Cloth: 978-0-226-56214-8 | Paper: 978-0-226-56228-5 | Electronic: 978-0-226-56231-5
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226562315.001.0001
ABOUT THIS BOOKAUTHOR BIOGRAPHYREVIEWSTABLE OF CONTENTS

ABOUT THIS BOOK

Until well into the twentieth century, pack animals were the primary mode of transport for supplying armies in the field. The British Indian Army was no exception. In the late nineteenth century, for example, it forcibly pressed into service thousands of camels of the Indus River basin to move supplies into and out of contested areas—a system that wreaked havoc on the delicately balanced multispecies environment of humans, animals, plants, and microbes living in this region of Northwest India.
 
In Animal Labor and Colonial Warfare, James Hevia examines the use of camels, mules, and donkeys in colonial campaigns of conquest and pacification, starting with the Second Afghan War—during which an astonishing 50,000 to 60,000 camels perished—and ending in the early twentieth century. Hevia explains how during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries a new set of human-animal relations were created as European powers and the United States expanded their colonial possessions and attempted to put both local economies and ecologies in the service of resource extraction. The results were devastating to animals and human communities alike, disrupting centuries-old ecological and economic relationships. And those effects were lasting: Hevia shows how a number of the key issues faced by the postcolonial nation-state of Pakistan—such as shortages of clean water for agriculture, humans, and animals, and limited resources for dealing with infectious diseases—can be directly traced to decisions made in the colonial past. An innovative study of an underexplored historical moment, Animal Labor and Colonial Warfare opens up the animal studies to non-Western contexts and provides an empirically rich contribution to the emerging field of multispecies historical ecology.
 

AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY

James L. Hevia is professor of history and director of the undergraduate program in global studies at the University of Chicago. He is the author of, most recently, The Imperial Security State and English Lessons.
 

REVIEWS

“In a richly documented and skilfully constructed story of animal bio-power, Hevia investigates the role that camels and mules played in the military logistics of British India as it struggled to recover from the disaster of the Anglo-Afghan War. Moving between frontier wars and global trade, local knowledge and imperial science, he sheds fresh light on animals at war and their impressment into service of the colonial war-state. His fascinating and meticulous discussion unites the intricacies of camel culture, mule breeding, animal dietetics, and human affect, with imperial strategy, army reform, environmental transformation, and veterinary science. Transcending many more conventional histories of animals and armies, this book makes a major contribution, substantively, methodologically, and intellectually, to how we conceptualize warfare, welfare, and the animal estate.”
— David Arnold, University of Warwick

Animal Labor and Colonial Warfare brilliantly reveals the brutal and bestial life of British imperialism. With exceptional panache, James Hevia assembles graceful and music-loving camels, well-bred mules, maddening insects, unremitting parasites, indispensable animal handlers, and cosmopolitan veterinarians, showing us how together they structured—or disrupted—the colonial human-animal biosecurity regime. Above all, we learn how the military on colonial frontiers forged a mechanism for managing human-animal interactions and rerouting local ecologies. After reading this book, it is hard to imagine how future historians of colonial biopolitics can ever again ignore frontier ecologies and the teeming—or teaming—non-human animals that made human life possible.”
— Warwick Anderson, University of Sydney

“The role of animals in colonial conquest along the northwestern frontier of British India has never been subjected to scholarly analysis of the sort provided by this path-breaking book. Showing the shifting visions of power, science, and ecology intertwined in the establishment of the new forms of state power, Hevia details how changing relations between humans and animals can provide a critical key to understanding the transformations that have marked modern colonial history.”
— David Gilmartin, North Carolina State University

"An intriguing work. . . . This interesting volume is a valuable contribution. Recommended."
— Choice

"An invaluable history for those interested in the use of animals in wartime and the colonial history of the disruption of nonhuman and human species in specific environments."
— Animal Studies Journal

"This is a smart book that deserves a wide audience. . . . By bringing together interspecies relations and empire, the summary point, then, is the exigent realization that our relations with other animals are nearly always colonial."
— American Historical Review

"James L. Hevia’s Animal Labor and Colonial Warfare. . . departs from the dominant focus on dogs (and horses) in Victorian animal studies. Hevia is concerned primarily with camels, with rich supplementary material coming in the form of Trypanosoma evansi, a “protozoan blood parasite” which had a significant effect on the camel population in India in the late nineteenth century. . . . Animal Labor and Colonial Warfare is one of our finest works of animal history to date and a valuable companion piece to Mike Davis’s seminal study Late Victorian Holocausts: El Niño Famines and the Making of the Third World (2001) and to Dinesh Wadiwel’s work on animal labor."
— Victorian Studies

TABLE OF CONTENTS


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226562315.003.0001
[Animals in War memorial;animal studies;veterinary medicine;animal handlers;sarwans]
The introduction situates the book in relation to animal studies, recent work on animal-human codependency, animal cruelty legislations in Great Britain, and constructive colonialism in which an animal management regime headed by tropical veterinary surgeons was inaugurated in India. It raises question about how we think about animal-human relations in these contexts and whether there might have been different perceptions in colonies as opposed to the imperial metropole about such relations. It then notes that London's "Animals in War" memorial contains no reference to the native animal handlers, nor to colonialism. The introduction concludes with an overview of the structure of the book
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226562315.003.0002
[Saharasia;impressment;transport reform;Mughal empire;veterinary surgeons]
Chapter 1 is preceded by a Prologue which lays out the physical and climatological constraints of launching military operations in Western and Central Asia and on the Northwest frontier of India. Comparisons are made between Ottoman and Mughal approaches to the problems posed by the physical geography of these regions. Chapter 1 then turns to the Second Afghan War and the chaotic nature of army supply arrangements, beginning with the forced impressment and death of thousands of camels from the Punjab and Sind. The historical record indicate that environment was only one factor in the deaths of animals -- poor management of supply lines, incompetent transport officers and animal handlers, starvation, and ill-treatment also played major roles. These other causes of death were identified by army veterinarians, who had little authority to change matters. As the war wrapped up, it became clear that the Indian army transport system needed to be reorganized.
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226562315.003.0003
[browsing;Sufi saints;pastoralists;desert plants;Sufi shrines]
Chapter 2 explores pack animal life, particularly that of camels, prior to impressment in the army. After laying out the physical features of northwest British India, the chapter discusses its fauna and flora, ways of life, and the codependent relations of animals, pastoralists and agriculturalists. In some cases, these codependencies were informed by Islamic ethics and were expressed in the rich cultural life of Sufi shrines, where nomads, farmers and townspeople intermixed on key ritual occasions.
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226562315.003.0004
[mules;global supply chain;Donkey jacks]
This chapter explores the initial efforts by the Indian army to improve its transport system. Reforms were linked to a belief that mules might be a more appropriate pack animal to build the new transport scheme around. The problem, however, was that there were few mules in India. Donkey studs were imported from Europe to resolve this issue, but when the results were inadequate, the army turned to the Americas and East Asia in order to fulfill its mule requirements. By the beginning of the twentieth century, the Indian Army had established a global supply chain for trafficking in mules and donkey studs.
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226562315.003.0005
[animal management;veterinary science;dietetics;pharmacopeia]
In the 1880s, a small group of veterinary surgeons addressed the inadequacies they saw inIndian Army transport, including their own absence of authority, by starting a professional journal. For several years the Quarterly Journal of Veterinary Science and Army Animal Managementaddressed a number of pressing issues and what they saw as indifference on the part of army and government leadership. Articles dealt with animal hygiene and diet, diseases, and care. And on the premise that the primary problem with the camel was British ignorance, the journal published a number of pieces on the animal's physiology, and proper care and management.
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226562315.003.0006
[transport committee;impressment;frontier rebellion]
In 1897 frontier outbreaks among disgruntled Pashtun tribes led several expeditions by the Indian Army. The reformed transport system was soon exhausted and impressment of thousands of pack followed. This chapter relies on eye-witness sources and internal army reports to reconstruct the experience of impressment. Both evaluations by army officers and civilian officials found the existing system inadequate and unfair to pack animal owners in the Punjab. Hearings were held and a variety of recommendations were made for change. Meanwhile in London, questions about the legality of impressment were raised in the House of Commons and the House of Lords.
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226562315.003.0007
[Rawalpindi Transport Committee;Sanford Committee;Reserve Camel and Mule corps;Silladar Camel and Mule Corps;Grantee Corps;canal colonies;militarization;camel and mule land grants]
This chapter reviews the inception of a new transport system in the Indian Army, one made up of permanent establishment, including a training regime for transport officers and animal handlers, and a robust reserve corps termed Silladar units. The new order was created after two transport committees in 1897-98 completed their findings on the problems with the existing system. They recommended a system made up of permanent units and a robust reserve called Silladar corps. In addition, they recommended tying land grants in the Indus River canal colonies to Grantee transport units. This system, with minor modifications, was inaugurated in the early twentieth century and furthered the militarization of the Northwest Frontier of British India.
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226562315.003.0008
[animal management;animal biopower;canal expansion;camel browsing committee]
This chapter explores, through publications of army veterinarians and annual reports, the organization of a camel and mule biopower regime as animal management. The chapter then turns to ecological impact of irrigation canal expansion in the Punjab, and resulting problems for army transport, particularly the reserves. The canals reduced camel grazing land and created breeding grounds for vectors of infectious diseases. Tensions within the colonial bureaucracy over these problems are highlighted through consideration of continued problems with mule breeding and procurement and the report of a committee on camel browsing.
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226562315.003.0009
[Trypanosomiasis;surra;biting flies;arsenic drugs;Nagonal;]
One of these infectious diseases, Trypanosomiasis, known to Punjabi sarwans as surra, was transmitted by biting flies. The canals created new breeding grounds for these flies and by 1907 surra was rife in the transport camel corps. A veterinarian was appointed to investigate the disease, which was akin to a similar disease among cattle in Africa and human Sleeping Sickness. This chapter follows the investigation of surra by Arnold Leese and other veterinarians, the controversy that developed over its mode of transmission, and the use if arsenic-based drugs to treat the disease. Surra continued to be a problem into the late 1920s, when a new drug called Nagonal was used to suppress it.
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226562315.003.0010
[Mesopotamia;Egypt;Imperial Camel Corps;retrenchment;trucks]
In 1914 the Indian Army transport system, including all its reserve units, was mobilized. Units were deployed to Mesopotamia and Egypt. Similar problems associated with camel losses occurred during these campaigns. Some camels were used as cavalry and their riders developed very positive views of the animal in comparison to those who remained in transport. Following the war, the Indian Army, under the sign of retrenchment, began to downsize the transport corps and replace some of the camel units with trucks. Yet the demands of mountain warfare made it impossible to completely abandon animal transport. Camels and mules continued participate in border campaigns right through to the end of the British Indian empire.
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226562315.003.0011
[garrison state;irrigation canals;surra;food security;postscript]
This chapter considers the impact of the transformation of animal and human life under British rule in northwest India. The postcolonial nation-state of Pakistan remains very much under the domination of its military, while the land continues to deal with the problems created by the canal system, including water logging, salinization, and fly-breeding. Surra continues to be an issue and as difficult to deal with as in the past because of the peculiar biology of the trypanosome. And while camels no longer function as the primary form of overland transport in the region, state planners image them as an asset in economic development plans and in calculations about food security. A postscript reviews the major findings of the study
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...