Money, Power, and the People The American Struggle to Make Banking Democratic
by Christopher W. Shaw
University of Chicago Press, 2019
Cloth: 978-0-226-63633-7 | Electronic: 978-0-226-63647-4
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226636474.001.0001

AVAILABLE FROM

University of Chicago Press (cloth, ebook)
ABOUT THIS BOOKAUTHOR BIOGRAPHYREVIEWSTABLE OF CONTENTS

ABOUT THIS BOOK

Banks and bankers are hardly the most beloved institutions and people in this country. With its corruptive influence on politics and stranglehold on the American economy, Wall Street is held in high regard by few outside the financial sector. But the pitchforks raised against this behemoth are largely rhetorical: we rarely see riots in the streets or public demands for an equitable and democratic banking system that result in serious national changes.

Yet the situation was vastly different a century ago, as Christopher W. Shaw shows. This book upends the conventional thinking that financial policy in the early twentieth century was set primarily by the needs and demands of bankers. Shaw shows that banking and politics were directly shaped by the literal and symbolic investments of the grassroots. This engagement remade financial institutions and the national economy, through populist pressure and the establishment of federal regulatory programs and agencies like the Farm Credit System and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Shaw reveals the surprising groundswell behind seemingly arcane legislation, as well as the power of the people to demand serious political repercussions for the banks that caused the Great Depression. One result of this sustained interest and pressure was legislation and regulation that brought on a long period of relative financial stability, with a reduced frequency of economic booms and busts. Ironically, this stability led to the decline of the very banking politics that brought it about.

Giving voice to a broad swath of American figures, including workers, farmers, politicians, and bankers alike, Money, Power, and the People recasts our understanding of what might be possible in balancing the needs of the people with those of their financial institutions.

AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY

Christopher W. Shaw received a doctorate in history from the University of California, Berkeley.

REVIEWS

“A remarkably timely—and genuinely timeless—account of one of the great struggles over the character of American capitalism. Money, Power, and the People will open your eyes about America’s financial and political past and open your mind about reforms that could create a more equitable future. You will enjoy and learn from this extraordinary book—that’s a promise you can take to the bank.”
— William C. Taylor, cofounder and founding editor of Fast Company

“In a dazzling—dare I say gripping!—historical narrative, Shaw reminds us of the surpassing importance of finance to the people it serves. Money, Power, and the People underscores how the greatest financial innovations came in the form of institutions that were demanded and designed through the will of the American people.”
— Sarah Bloom Raskin, former U.S. Deputy Secretary of the Treasury

“An engaging and enlightening history of working people’s fight against big finance. Essential reading for anyone who wants to understand the evolution of banking and politics from the Gilded Age to Occupy Wall Street.”
— Christina D. Romer, former chair of the Council of Economic Advisers

“A forceful, lively, and eloquent historical polemic. In original and provocative terms, Shaw reveals the vital role popular social movements played in reforming the American banking system in response to the mounting economic instability and inequality of the early twentieth century, and how these hard-won reforms provided the essential financial framework for the sustained economic growth and widely-shared prosperity of the postwar era. This is a bracing political and historical argument, deserving of a wide audience.”
— Jeffrey Sklansky, author of Sovereign of the Market: The Money Question in Early America

“Deeply researched and energetically written, Money, Power, and the People could not be timelier. Anyone concerned about how today’s giant banks have rigged the regulatory system to become too big to fail, fueling the crisis of income inequality, will find this book a revelation.”
— Charles Postel, author of The Populist Vision

“Shaw demonstrates forcefully how, during the twentieth century, the U.S. private banking system was a major force behind instability, inequality, and economic injustice. Shaw also shows how workers and farmers struggled to create a banking system that truly served their interests. What emerges from this important book is that democratic banking in the U.S. has both deep roots and enormous potential for building a more just society.”
— Robert Pollin, University of Massachusetts, Amherst

“There’s an old refrain that still rings true for millions of people who get chewed up and spit out by the gatekeepers of America’s financial system: “To keep your beer real cold, put it next to a banker’s heart.” Shaw’s excellent history of what he calls “banking politics” shows how essential it is to battle this selfish, exploitative, undemocratic system and develop one that serves workers, farmers, small business, and ordinary consumers.”
— Jim Hightower, editor of The Hightower Lowdown

Money, Power, and the People takes us on a fascinating journey through a time when opposition to the economic and political power of bankers and financial interests formed a cornerstone of progressive and populist politics. Accessible and comprehensive, it is a must read for those seeking to understand and confront the role of big finance in our current systemic crisis.”
— Gar Alperovitz, author of America Beyond Capitalism

“Shaw’s book shows us that democratic battles to define the shape of the financial system—and ensure that it serves Main Street—are as American as apple pie. Principles of fairness, access and accountability were important one hundred years ago, just as they are today. Anyone interested in financial regulation today would benefit from reading this rich history.”
— Timothy Massad, former chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission

“Highly recommended. In this engaging and well-researched study, historian Christopher Shaw examines what he calls “banking politics,” the political force emerging from the activism of ordinary people who joined together to challenge financial institutions.”
— Choice

“[Shaw’s] book offers a powerful lesson in what mass democratic politics can accomplish when people pay attention to the laws and institutions that govern how money is made and channeled. . . . The most remarkable aspect of Shaw’s book is that he documents, as no one has done before, just how many people played a part in this protracted political drama. He pulls evidence from an incredible range of organizations, media outlets, and individuals, many quite obscure. . . Money, Power, and the People reminds us that the rules of the monetary system are too important to be left to financial elites. Crucially, it also inspires confidence that when ordinary people speak up, they often come up with better plans.”
— Dissent

2020 Outstanding Academic Title, Economics
— Choice

TABLE OF CONTENTS


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226636474.003.0001
[Panic of 1907;financial crisis;J P Morgan;currency;Jacob S Coxey;greenbackers;populism;postal savings;deposit insurance]
The Panic of 1907 marked the inception of an intense decades-long debate over the form and function of the American financial system. Banking interests were arrayed against farmers and workers who drew on a rich nineteenth-century legacy of heterodox financial thought. Numerous Americans sought banking reforms that prioritized public accountability, macroeconomic stability, affordable credit, and secure savings.


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226636474.003.0002
[emergency currency;asset currency;unemployment;Aldrich-Vreeland Act;Nelson W Aldrich;William Jennings Bryan;Theodore Roosevelt;Robert M La Follette;National Monetary Commission]
In response to the Panic of 1907, Congress enacted the Emergency Currency Act of 1908 as a stopgap solution. Deferring comprehensive financial reform provided bankers with the opportunity to regroup and unite around a legislative program. This measure also attempted to erect barriers against popular participation in banking policy discussions by creating the banker-friendly National Monetary Commission to study financial questions and issue recommendations.


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226636474.003.0003
[financial monopoly;Money Trust;deposit insurance;Postal Savings Bank Act;agricultural credit;farm debt;Aldrich plan;Jekyll Island;Charles A. Lindbergh Sr;Pujo Committee]
As the political struggle over financial reform unfolded between 1908 and 1912, working people demanded significant government involvement in finance, waging campaigns for postal savings, bank deposit guaranty, and agricultural credit reform. Bankers were forced ever more on the defensive, as a number of state guaranty programs and a postal savings system were established. Americans increasingly deplored that a “money trust” gave a handful of men vast influence over the nation’s economy and politics, and Congress responded with a heavily publicized investigation of financial monopoly.


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226636474.003.0004
[Federal Reserve Act;central bank;Progressivism;farm mortgages;Federal Farm Loan Act;Woodrow Wilson;Carter Glass;William Jennings Bryan]
Workers’ and farmers’ opposition to financial monopoly influenced the shape of the Federal Reserve System in crucial ways. Popular political pressure produced a decentralized central bank rooted in a principle that bankers vociferously resisted: public authority. Furthermore, the campaign that banking politics advocates had waged during the central bank debate produced the Federal Farm Loan System.


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226636474.003.0005
[Depression of 1920–21;Federal Reserve System;Agricultural Credits Act;labor banks;branch banking;McFadden Act;farm debt;silver;deflation;fiscal crisis]
During the Great Depression, bankers managed to directly antagonize farmers, workers, and depositors. The cumulative actions of financial interests from the post–World War I agricultural crisis forward engendered deep anger among many farmers. Workers were no less incensed that bankers were campaigning for wage cuts during the Depression. And when bankers initiated a movement to levy fees on depositors, they further fueled the growing public sense of outrage.


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226636474.003.0006
[bank failures;banking crisis;Reconstruction Finance Corporation;Glass-Steagall Act of 1932;Federal Home Loan Bank Act;Jacob S Coxey;Coin Harvey;Bonus Army;Farmers Holiday Association]
Approximately 4,500 banks failed from January 1930 through June 1932. Although the Hoover administration attempted to prop up the private banking system, the financial situation did not improve. Discontent with the banking system facilitated the rise of new movements and leaders, while financial reformers who had attained prominence in the 1890s received renewed public attention.


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226636474.003.0007
[Great Depression;postal savings;Bank Holiday;Franklin D Roosevelt;Emergency Banking Act;Financial monopoly;John P Frey;George W Norris;Peter Norbeck;Ferdinand Pecora]
Public anger toward bankers was pervasive and unmistakable following the collapse of the private banking system in March 1933. But rather then embarking on a new epoch in American financial history, President Franklin D. Roosevelt elected to save the existing banks. A strong current of public opinion, however, demanded that the banking fraternity be deposed once and for all.


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226636474.003.0008
[Glass-Steagall Act of 1933;Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation;branch banking;gold standard;Wall Street;investment banking;deposit insurance;William Lemke;A P Giannini]
The Banking Act of 1933 curbed Wall Street by separating commercial banking and investment banking. This reform’s establishment of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation brought peace of mind to millions of small savers and unprecedented stability to the financial system. Although government exercised new authority over finance, the private banking system still existed.


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226636474.003.0009
[public relations;Emergency Farm Mortgage Act;Farm Credit Administration;Home Owners Loan Corporation;homeownership;home mortgages;Federal Housing Administration;credit unions;Roy Bergengren;Federal Credit Union Act]
The New Deal attended to a number of the nation’s most pressing financial issues when it established programs to aid depositors, farmers, and homeowners. This development reduced public pressure for far-reaching reform of the private banking system. Simultaneously, popular interest in financial questions increasingly was directed toward the credit union movement.


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226636474.003.0010
[New Deal;National Labor Relations Act;Agricultural Adjustment Act;Franklin D Roosevelt;Frances Perkins;Henry A Wallace;Farm Bureau;grange;Farmers Union;American Federation of Labor]
By the end of the 1930s, organized agriculture and labor were withdrawing from banking and monetary debates and critical appraisals of finance were less common. The New Deal had encouraged farmer and worker organizations to participate in discrete policy areas. Unions learned to concentrate their political efforts on established labor issues, while farmer organizations focused on well-defined agricultural questions.


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226636474.003.0011
[Banking Act of 1935;Federal Reserve System;central banking;monetary policy;open market operations;American Bankers Association;Carter Glass;Marriner Eccles;Charles E Coughlin]
The Banking Act of 1935 empowered publicly appointed officials to initiate monetary policy. The abiding demand of workers and farmers for government banking had assisted the efforts of the Roosevelt administration and its congressional allies to increase the Federal Reserve System’s independence from the banking fraternity. Given the unfavorable political climate bankers faced, their opposition to the measure was uncharacteristically restrained.


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226636474.003.0012
[Jerry Voorhis;Wright Patman;Federal Reserve Banks;central banking;Ham and Eggs;Retirement Life Payments Association;credit unions;Bretton Woods]
The vitality of banking politics ebbed over the course of the 1930s. Enduring popular interest in financial issues was not matched by commensurate support from farmer and worker organizations. Many working people shifted their focus toward furthering the credit union movement. But banking politics retained influence, nonetheless, and its argument appeared to be emerging victorious.


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226636474.003.0013
[Wright Patman;Federal Reserve System;postal savings;Bretton Woods;fiscal crisis;farm crisis;deindustrialization;deregulation;Glass-Steagall;financial crisis of 2008]
Banking politics abruptly receded from popular consciousness following World War II. By the end of the twentieth century, bankers exercised unprecedented political power and enjoyed wealth commensurate with a level of economic inequality that harkened back to pre–New Deal levels. The national economy was growing ever more dependent on the financial sector and experienced periods of crisis with greater frequency.