In Being and Time, Heidegger announced the “Task of Destroying the History of Ontology” in order to free what had remained “unthought” in Western metaphysics. The unpublished part of that work was to be titled “Basic Features of a Phenomenological Destruction of the History of Ontology. According to the Guiding Thread of the Problem of Temporality.” This latest work in the Reiner Schürmann Selected Writings and Lecture Notes series aims to carry out Heidegger’s plan. The destruction, or, as it is later called, the deconstruction of metaphysics, has a negative side—the peeling off, or the archeology, of metaphysical history by means of the guiding thread of the question of Being—and a positive side—“retrieval” of the original experience of Being in ancient Greek philosophy.
 
“The destruction has no other intent than to win back the original experience of metaphysics through a deconstruction of those conceptions which have become current and empty.” The purpose of taking to pieces the fabric of Western metaphysics is to show how at each important stage “the question of the meaning of Being has not only remained unattended to or inadequately raised, but that it has become quite forgotten in spite of all our interest in 'metaphysics'.”

“Here Lies” preceded by “The Indian Culture” collects two of Antonin Artaud’s foremost poetic works from the last period of his life. He wrote both works soon after his release from the psychiatric hospital of Rodez and his return to Paris, and they were published during the flurry of intensive activity and protests against his work’s censorship. The Indian Culture is the first and most ambitious work of Artaud’s last period. It deals with his travels in Mexico in 1936 where Artaud sets aside his usual preoccupations with peyote and the Tarahumara people’s sorcerers to directly anatomize his obsessions with gods, corporeality, and sexuality. Here Lies is Artaud’s final declaration of autonomy for his own body from its birth to its imminent death, won at the cost of multiple battles against the infiltrating powers amassed to steal that birth and death away from him. Both works demonstrate Artaud’s final poetry as a unique amalgam of delicate linguistic invention and ferociously obscene invective.
 
“Here Lies” preceded by “The Indian Culture” was translated by the award-winning translator Clayton Eshleman, widely seen as the preeminent translator into English of Artaud’s work, with its profound intensity and multiply nuanced language. For the first time since its first publication, this bilingual edition presents the two works in one volume, as Artaud originally intended. This edition also features a contextual afterword by Stephen Barber as well as new material, previously untranslated into English.
 

Le portrait est sans conteste le genre artistique le plus fécond du début des Temps modernes. Dans la France du XVIIe siècle, qui se distingue par une mobilité sociale inconnue jusqu’alors, le portrait permet précisément d’appuyer la revendication d’un nouveau statut social ou d’assurer un rang acquis, mais désormais remis en question. Le portrait se fait également l’écho de la discussion capitale concernant le rapport entre le corps et l’âme. Pourtant, les sources écrites parvenues jusqu’à nous, qui s’intéressent au portrait, sont étonnamment parcimonieuses. L’Académie royale de peinture et de sculpture fondée en 1648, en particulier, est presque totalement muette à ce sujet. Et ce, bien que nombre de ses membres gagnent leur vie comme portraitistes et que le genre voie son importance s’accroître au cours du Grand Siècle : les portraits se multiplient, tandis que leur prix augmente constamment. Il semble que l’Académie ait sciemment passé sous silence le portrait et les débats afférents, afin de mieux célébrer comme sa véritable mission la peinture d’histoire, sur laquelle l’institution nous a laissé d’innombrables témoignages.

La présente étude reconstitue les discours autour du portrait dans la France du XVIIe siècle et dévoile une discussion d’une vivacité surprenante, où d’aucuns se sont même demandé si le portrait ne méritait pas – plutôt que la peinture d’histoire – d’occuper la première place dans la hiérarchie des genres.

Dans ce petit livre intempestif arc-bouté à la conviction selon laquelle « le christianisme est la religion de la sortie de la religion » (Marcel Gauchet), Thierry de Duve sort des disciplines qui sont les siennes, l’esthétique et histoire de l’art, pour aborder deux questions anthropologiques que la mutation de l’ordre symbolique en cours rend pressantes : la différence des sexes, qu’il envisage par le biais de l’incertitude de la paternité, et l’avenir de la politique d’émancipation, qu’il ancre à la naissance prématurée des enfants humains. Le ton de ce livre est une certaine effronterie respectueuse par laquelle de Duve engage un dialogue imaginaire avec quelques grandes figures intellectuelles, parmi lesquelles Françoise Héritier, Alain Badiou, Georges Duby, Marcel Gauchet et, last but not least, Jacques Lacan.

A cooperative reflection on how to teach art.

How should art be taught? What kind of knowledge should artists absorb? How might an ordinary person become a creature addicted to the creative process? In other words, how can a non-artist become an artist? Such programmatic questions articulated by acclaimed Polish artist Artur Żmijewski were at the heart of the workshop “How to Teach Art?” Żmijewski invited a group of graduate and doctoral students from three Zurich universities—the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, the University of Zurich, and the Zurich University of the Arts—to collectively reflect on their artistic practices. Over the course of four months, the group met several times a week for hourlong sessions, following individual and collective exercises induced by Żmijewski himself.
 
This book retraces the workshop and its process by showing inconclusive, fragmentary results between theory and practice. How to Teach Art? presents drawings, videos, photographs, 16mm films, and accompanying reflections on the central premise, “How to teach art?”

The first comprehensive collection in English of Antonin Artaud’s writings on his artworks.

The many major exhibitions of Antonin Artaud’s drawings and drawn notebook pages in recent years—at New York’s Museum of Modern Art, Vienna’s Museum Moderner Kunst, and Paris’s Centre Georges Pompidou—have entirely transformed our perception of his work, reorienting it toward the artworks of his final years. This volume collects all three of Artaud’s major writings on his artworks. “The Human Face” (1947) was written as the catalog text for Artaud’s only gallery exhibition of his drawings during his lifetime, focusing on his approach to making portraits of his friends at the decrepit pavilion in the Paris suburbs where he spent the final year of his life. “Ten years that language is gone” (1947) examines the drawings Artaud made in his notebooks—his main creative medium at the end of his life—and their capacity to electrify his creativity when language failed him. “50 Drawings to assassinate magic” (1948), the residue of an abandoned book of Artaud’s drawings, approaches the act of drawing as part of the weaponry deployed by Artaud at the very end of his life to combat malevolent assaults and attempted acts of assassination. Together, these three extraordinary texts—pitched between writing and image—project Artaud’s ferocious engagement with the act of drawing.
 

A new approach to the notion of ecology emphasizing its relevance for art and design.
 
The notion of ecology not only figures centrally in current debates around climate change, but also traverses contemporary discourses in the arts, the humanities, and the social and techno sciences. In this present form, ecology refers to the multilayered and multidimensional nexus of living processes and technological and media practices—that is, to the complex relations of human and nonhuman agents. Hybrid Ecologies understands ecology as an ambivalent notion, whose very broadness simultaneously opens up new fields of action and raises provocative questions, not least concerning its genealogy. This interdisciplinary volume explores the political and social effects of rethinking community in ecological terms, with a particular emphasis on what the contemporary notion of ecology might mean for artistic and design practices. The result of the fifth annual program of the cx centre for interdisciplinary studies, which was conceived in cooperation with the Chair of Philosophy | Aesthetic Theory at the Academy of Fine Arts in Munich, Hybrid Ecologies is a timely and thought-provoking study of one of the most important themes of our time.