Results by title

60 books match the query 'Supreme Court Review' and 60 start with t

Sort by

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1960

The Supreme Court Review, 1960

Edited by Philip B. Kurland

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1960

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1961

The Supreme Court Review, 1961

Edited by Philip B. Kurland

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1961

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1962

The Supreme Court Review, 1962

Edited by Philip B. Kurland

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1962

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1963

The Supreme Court Review, 1963

Edited by Philip B. Kurland

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1963

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1966

The Supreme Court Review, 1966

Edited by Philip B. Kurland

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1966

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1967

The Supreme Court Review, 1967

Edited by Philip B. Kurland

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1967

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1968

The Supreme Court Review, 1968

Edited by Philip B. Kurland

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1968

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1969

The Supreme Court Review, 1969

Edited by Philip B. Kurland

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1969

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1970

The Supreme Court Review, 1970

Edited by Philip B. Kurland

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1970

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1971

The Supreme Court Review, 1971

Edited by Philip B. Kurland

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1971

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1973

The Supreme Court Review, 1973

Edited by Philip B. Kurland

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1974

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1974

The Supreme Court Review, 1974

Edited by Philip B. Kurland

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1975

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1975

The Supreme Court Review, 1975

Edited by Philip B. Kurland

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1976

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1976

The Supreme Court Review, 1976

Edited by Philip B. Kurland

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1977

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1977

The Supreme Court Review, 1977

Edited by Philip B. Kurland

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1978

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1979

The Supreme Court Review, 1979

Edited by Philip B. Kurland

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1980

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1981

The Supreme Court Review, 1981

Edited by Philip B. Kurland

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1982

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1982

The Supreme Court Review, 1982

Edited by Philip B. Kurland

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1983

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1983

The Supreme Court Review, 1983

Edited by Philip B. Kurland

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1984

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1985

The Supreme Court Review, 1985

Edited by Philip B. Kurland

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1986

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1986

The Supreme Court Review, 1986

Edited by Philip B. Kurland, Gerhard Casper, and Dennis J. Hutchinson

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1987

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1987

The Supreme Court Review, 1987

Edited by Philip B. Kurland, Gerhard Casper, and Dennis J. Hutchinson

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1988

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1988

The Supreme Court Review, 1988

Edited by Philip B. Kurland, Gerhard Casper, and Dennis J. Hutchinson

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1989

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1989

The Supreme Court Review, 1989

Edited by Philip B. Kurland, Gerhard Casper, and Dennis J. Hutchinson

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1990

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1990

The Supreme Court Review, 1990

Edited by Gerhard Casper and Dennis J. Hutchinson

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1991

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1991

The Supreme Court Review, 1991

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1992

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1992

The Supreme Court Review, 1992

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1993

Since it first appeared in 1960, the Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. Individual essays in the 1994 volume include articles by Craig M. Bradley on RICO and the first amendment; Bernard Schwartz on clear and present danger versus advocacy of unlawful action; William P. Marshall and Susan Gilles on the Supreme Court, the first amendment, and bad journalism; Paul Finkelman on Prigg v. Pennsylvania; Richard H. Fallon, Jr. on sexual harassment, content neutrality, and the first amendment; Lea Brilmayer on federalism, state authority, and the preemptive power of internal law; and C. Edwin Baker on Turner Broadcasting and content-based regulation of persons and presses.

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1993

The Supreme Court Review, 1993

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1994

Since it first appeared in 1960, the Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. Individual essays in the 1994 volume include articles by Craig M. Bradley on RICO and the first amendment; Bernard Schwartz on clear and present danger versus advocacy of unlawful action; William P. Marshall and Susan Gilles on the Supreme Court, the first amendment, and bad journalism; Paul Finkelman on Prigg v. Pennsylvania; Richard H. Fallon, Jr. on sexual harassment, content neutrality, and the first amendment; Lea Brilmayer on federalism, state authority, and the preemptive power of internal law; and C. Edwin Baker on Turner Broadcasting and content-based regulation of persons and presses.

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1994

The Supreme Court Review, 1994

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1995

Since it first appeared in 1960, the Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. Individual essays in the 1994 volume include articles by Craig M. Bradley on RICO and the first amendment; Bernard Schwartz on clear and present danger versus advocacy of unlawful action; William P. Marshall and Susan Gilles on the Supreme Court, the first amendment, and bad journalism; Paul Finkelman on Prigg v. Pennsylvania; Richard H. Fallon, Jr. on sexual harassment, content neutrality, and the first amendment; Lea Brilmayer on federalism, state authority, and the preemptive power of internal law; and C. Edwin Baker on Turner Broadcasting and content-based regulation of persons and presses.

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1995

The Supreme Court Review, 1995

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1996

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1996

The Supreme Court Review, 1996

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1997

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1997

The Supreme Court Review, 1997

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1998

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1998

The Supreme Court Review, 1998

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1999

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1999

The Supreme Court Review, 1999

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2000

"Some of the best researched and most thoughtful criticisms of recent decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court."—Ethics

Since it first appeared in 1960, The Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. Consisting of diverse essays by distinguished lawyers, historians, and social scientists, each volume presents informed analyses of past and present opinions and discusses important public law issues that have come under Court consideration.

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2000

The Supreme Court Review, 2000

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2001

"Some of the best researched and most thoughtful criticism of recent decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court."—Ethics

The Supreme Court Review keeps you at the forefront of the Court's most significant decisions by surveying its origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law and compelling you to consider the impacts of legal institutions and judicial opinion. Diverse essays of informed analyses of past and present opinions document the complexities of the Court and relevant public law issues. Legal scholars, lawyers, judges, historians, political scientists, economists, and journalists have won acclaim for their contributions to each volume.

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2001

The Supreme Court Review, 2001

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2002

Since it first appeared in 1960, The Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. Consisting of diverse essays by distinguished lawyers, historians, and social scientists, each volume presents informed analyses of past and present opinions and discusses important public law issues that have come under Court consideration.

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2002

The Supreme Court Review, 2002

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2003

Since its inception in 1960, The Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court's most significant decisions. Recent volumes have considered issues such as the 2000 elections in Florida, Federalism and state sovereignty, the Boerne v. Flores case, and numerous Fourth Amendment issues. Distinguished participants analyze current and previous public issues, sentiments, and the implications of Court decisions.

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2003

The Supreme Court Review, 2003

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2004

The Supreme Court Review receives accolades for providing authoritative discussion of the Court's most significant decisions and their resonating impacts. Recent scholarship addresses school vouchers via Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, Federalism and state sovereignty, the current state of political parties, and judicial passivity. Distinguished participants across the field of Law analyze current and previous public issues, sentiments, and implications addressed under Court consideration.

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2004

The Supreme Court Review, 2004

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2005

Since its inception in 1960, The Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussions of the Court's most significant decisions. Distinguished participants hereanalyze current and previous public issues and sentiments and discuss the implications of court decisions.

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2005

The Supreme Court Review, 2005

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2006

For forty-five years The Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court’s most significant decisions. Recent volumes have considered issues such as the 2000 presidential election, cross-burning, federalism and state sovereignty, the United States v. American Library Association case, and numerous First and Fourth amendment cases. Distinguished participants analyze current and previous concerns and attitudes and discuss the implications of court decisions.

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2006

The Supreme Court Review, 2006

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2007

For forty-five years The Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court’s most significant decisions. Recent volumes have considered issues such as the 2000 presidential election, cross-burning, federalism and state sovereignty, the United States v. American Library Association case, and numerous First and Fourth amendment cases.

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2007

The Supreme Court Review, 2007

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2008

For forty-five years, The Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court’s most significant decisions. Recent volumes have considered such issues as the 2000 presidential election, cross burning, federalism and state sovereignty, the United States v. American Library Association case, failed Supreme Court nominations, and numerous First and Fourth amendment cases.

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2008

The Supreme Court Review, 2008

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2009

For forty-eight years, The Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court’s most significant decisions. The Review is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, at the forefront of studies of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. Recent volumes have considered such issues as the 2000 presidential election, cross burning, federalism and state sovereignty, the United States v. American Library Association case, failed Supreme Court nominations, and numerous First and Fourth amendment cases.

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2009

The Supreme Court Review, 2009

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2010

For forty-nine years, the Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court’s most significant decisions. The Review is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, one that strives to keep on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. Recent volumes have considered such issues as the 2000 presidential election, cross burning, federalism and state sovereignty, the United States v. American Library Association case, failed Supreme Court nominations, and numerous First and Fourth amendment cases.

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2010

The Supreme Court Review, 2010

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2011

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2011

The Supreme Court Review, 2011

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2012

For fifty years, The Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court’s most significant decisions. The Review is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. Recent volumes have considered such issues as post-9/11 security, the 2000 presidential election, cross burning, federalism and state sovereignty, failed Supreme Court nominations, and numerous First and Fourth amendment cases.

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2012

The Supreme Court Review, 2012

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2013

For fifty years, The Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the court's most significant decisions. The Review is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. Recent volumes have considered such issues as post-9/11 security, the 2000 presidential election, cross-burning, federalism and state sovereignty, failed Supreme Court nominations, and numerous First- and Fourth-Amendment cases.

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2013

The Supreme Court Review, 2013

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2014

For fifty years, The Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court's most significant decisions. The Review is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. Recent volumes have considered such issues as post-9/11 security, the 2000 presidential election, cross burning, federalism and state sovereignty, failed Supreme Court nominations, the battles concerning same-sex marriage, and numerous First and Fourth amendment cases.

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2014

The Supreme Court Review, 2014

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2015

For more than fifty years, The Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court's most significant decisions. An in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, The Supreme Court Review keeps at the forefront of the reforms and interpretations of American law. Recent volumes have considered such issues as post-9/11 security, the 2000 presidential election, cross burning, federalism and state sovereignty, failed Supreme Court nominations, the battles concerning same-sex marriage, and numerous First and Fourth Amendment cases.

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2015

The Supreme Court Review, 2015

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2016

For more than fifty years, The Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. The Supreme Court Review is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. It is written by and for legal academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians, economists, policy planners, and sociologists.

Publisher Login

Readers

Browse our collection.

Publishers

See BiblioVault's publisher services.

Student Services

Files for college accessibility offices.

Search

ADVANCED SEARCH

Browse

by TOPIC by BISAC Subject by LOC Subject by AUTHOR by PUBLISHER WANDER RANDOM TOPIC ABOUT BIBLIOVAULT EBOOK FULFILLMENT CONTACT US

RECENTLY PUBLISHED

Loading...