Results by title

2 books match the query 'Majority Rule'

cover of Activism, Majority Rule, and Local Democracy: Rethinking Public Influence

Activism, Majority Rule, and Local Democracy

Rethinking Public Influence

Brian E. Adams

Temple University Press, 2026

Local democracy doesn’t work as it should, declares Brian Adams in Activism, Majority Rule, and Local Democracy. Local politics is where citizens have the most opportunity for direct participation, control, and influence, but that activism doesn’t necessarily translate into majority rule.

While greater local engagement can produce policy that better reflects activists’ strong preferences, Adams explains that activists are not representative of the public-at-large and states that a reconceptualization of how the public should be able to influence local officials is required. Based on interviews with activists in San Diego, California, Adams concludes that activism can be beneficial, but we need to view it as distinct from majority rule, with a focus on managing the tension between the two.

Improving local democracy is not just a matter of generating more activism. It requires articulating when we want policy to reflect majority preferences and when we want activists to hold sway.

[more]
cover of Representation in America: Majority Rule in a Divided Political System

Representation in America

Majority Rule in a Divided Political System

Stephen Ansolabehere and Shiro Kuriwaki

University of Chicago Press, 0

A landmark appraisal of how Congress represents public opinion.

Drawing on nearly two decades of the Cooperative Congressional Election Study of American public opinion and more than one hundred key legislative proposals, Representation in America presents the most comprehensive, data-driven look at how Congress has represented the American public, spanning the presidencies of George W. Bush through Joe Biden. The result is a sweeping account of how electoral and legislative institutions channel and amplify majority preferences while tempering the most divisive proposals.

Stephen Ansolabehere and Shiro Kuriwaki trace each stage of the representation process, from constituents to their representatives to Congress’s collective decisions. Contrary to conceptions of democratic dysfunction, Ansolabehere and Kuriwaki find a strong majoritarian tendency: most proposals on the legislative agenda enjoy the support of the majority of Americans; voters tend to choose legislators whose positions they agree with; most legislators vote in line with the majority of their constituencies most of the time; and legislative districts magnify rather than mute majority opinion. When majority rule falls short, it usually takes the form of popular legislation stalling rather than Congress passing laws the public opposes.

[more]