Results by title

2 books match the query 'Public Loss'

cover of Anatomy of a Trial: Public Loss, Lessons Learned from The People vs. O.J. Simpson

Anatomy of a Trial

Public Loss, Lessons Learned from The People vs. O.J. Simpson

Jerrianne Hayslett

University of Missouri Press, 2008

The People vs. O. J. Simpson ranks indisputably as the trial of the century. It featured a double murder, a celebrity defendant, a perjuring witness, and a glove that didn’t fit. The trial became a media circus of outrageous proportions that led the judge to sequester the jury, eject disruptive reporters, and fine the lawyers thousands of dollars. Now an insider at The People vs. O. J. Simpson reveals the untold story of the most widely followed trial in American history and the indelible impact it has had on the judiciary, the media, and the public.
 
            As the Los Angeles Superior Court’s media liaison, Jerrianne Hayslett had unprecedented access to the trial—and met with Judge Lance Ito daily—as she attempted, sometimes unsuccessfully, to mediate between the court and members of the media and to balance their interests. In Anatomy of a Trial, she takes readers behind the scenes to shed new light on people and proceedings and to show how the media and the trial participants changed the court-media landscape to the detriment of the public’s understanding of the judicial system.
 
            For those who think they’ve already read all there is to know about the Simpson trial, this book is an eye-opener. Hayslett kept a detailed journal during the proceedings in which she recorded anecdotes and commentary. She also shares previously undisclosed information to expose some of the myths and stereotypes perpetuated by the trial, while affirming other stories that emerged during that time. By examining this trial after more than a decade, she shows how it has produced a bunker mentality in the judicial system, shaping media and public access to courts with lasting impact on such factors as cameras in the courtroom, jury selection, admonishments from the bench, and fair-trial/free-press tensions.
 
The first account of the trial written with Judge Ito’s cooperation, Anatomy of a Trial is a page-turning narrative and features photographs that capture both the drama of the courtroom and the excesses of the media. It also includes perspectives of legal and journalism authorities and offers a blueprint for how the courts and media can better meet their responsibilities to the public.
 
Even today, judges, lawyers, and journalists across the country say the Simpson trial changed everything. This book finally tells us why.
[more]
cover of Dealmaking Detroit: Two Essays About White Privilege, Private Gain, and Public Loss

Dealmaking Detroit

Two Essays About White Privilege, Private Gain, and Public Loss

Jamon Jordan and Craig Regester, with an introduction by Stephen M. Ward

Disobedience Press, 2027

Who profits from Detroit’s “reinvention”?

In two incisive essays, historian Jamon Jordan and lecturer and labor activist Craig Regester dismantle the facile, corporate narratives surrounding Detroit’s past, present, and future.

Jordan reveals how racial hierarchy has consistently shaped the making and unmaking of the city. He traces a direct line from 19th-century laws requiring “negroes” to pay $500 just to exist in Michigan, through generations of White managers overseeing Black auto workers, to mid-century “redevelopment” plans that displaced and demolished thousands of homes and 350 businesses in Black neighborhoods—and into the present day, where a banner celebrates White capitalist saviors for rescuing Detroit from failure.

Building on this trajectory, Regester scrutinizes the upcoming University of Michigan Center for Innovation in Detroit, a foregone conclusion and joint venture between a public university and a pair of billionaires. Though funded with $100 million in taxpayer dollars, neither the university, the state, nor the developers seriously considered community visions for how the center should serve Detroiters. Regester exposes how the avarice and technocentric whims of the ultra-rich increasingly compromise the public service missions of major research universitie

[more]