Results by title

35 books match the query 'Strauss, David A.'

cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1991

The Supreme Court Review, 1991

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1992

[more]
cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1992

The Supreme Court Review, 1992

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1993

Since it first appeared in 1960, the Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. Individual essays in the 1994 volume include articles by Craig M. Bradley on RICO and the first amendment; Bernard Schwartz on clear and present danger versus advocacy of unlawful action; William P. Marshall and Susan Gilles on the Supreme Court, the first amendment, and bad journalism; Paul Finkelman on Prigg v. Pennsylvania; Richard H. Fallon, Jr. on sexual harassment, content neutrality, and the first amendment; Lea Brilmayer on federalism, state authority, and the preemptive power of internal law; and C. Edwin Baker on Turner Broadcasting and content-based regulation of persons and presses.
[more]
cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1993

The Supreme Court Review, 1993

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1994

Since it first appeared in 1960, the Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. Individual essays in the 1994 volume include articles by Craig M. Bradley on RICO and the first amendment; Bernard Schwartz on clear and present danger versus advocacy of unlawful action; William P. Marshall and Susan Gilles on the Supreme Court, the first amendment, and bad journalism; Paul Finkelman on Prigg v. Pennsylvania; Richard H. Fallon, Jr. on sexual harassment, content neutrality, and the first amendment; Lea Brilmayer on federalism, state authority, and the preemptive power of internal law; and C. Edwin Baker on Turner Broadcasting and content-based regulation of persons and presses.
[more]
cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1994

The Supreme Court Review, 1994

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1995

Since it first appeared in 1960, the Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. Individual essays in the 1994 volume include articles by Craig M. Bradley on RICO and the first amendment; Bernard Schwartz on clear and present danger versus advocacy of unlawful action; William P. Marshall and Susan Gilles on the Supreme Court, the first amendment, and bad journalism; Paul Finkelman on Prigg v. Pennsylvania; Richard H. Fallon, Jr. on sexual harassment, content neutrality, and the first amendment; Lea Brilmayer on federalism, state authority, and the preemptive power of internal law; and C. Edwin Baker on Turner Broadcasting and content-based regulation of persons and presses.
[more]
cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1995

The Supreme Court Review, 1995

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1996

[more]
cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1996

The Supreme Court Review, 1996

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1997

[more]
cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1997

The Supreme Court Review, 1997

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1998

[more]
cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1998

The Supreme Court Review, 1998

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 1999

[more]
cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1999

The Supreme Court Review, 1999

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2000

"Some of the best researched and most thoughtful criticisms of recent decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court."—Ethics

Since it first appeared in 1960, The Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. Consisting of diverse essays by distinguished lawyers, historians, and social scientists, each volume presents informed analyses of past and present opinions and discusses important public law issues that have come under Court consideration.


[more]
cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2000

The Supreme Court Review, 2000

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2001

"Some of the best researched and most thoughtful criticism of recent decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court."—Ethics

The Supreme Court Review keeps you at the forefront of the Court's most significant decisions by surveying its origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law and compelling you to consider the impacts of legal institutions and judicial opinion. Diverse essays of informed analyses of past and present opinions document the complexities of the Court and relevant public law issues. Legal scholars, lawyers, judges, historians, political scientists, economists, and journalists have won acclaim for their contributions to each volume.
[more]
cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2001

The Supreme Court Review, 2001

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2002

Since it first appeared in 1960, The Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. Consisting of diverse essays by distinguished lawyers, historians, and social scientists, each volume presents informed analyses of past and present opinions and discusses important public law issues that have come under Court consideration.
[more]
cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2002

The Supreme Court Review, 2002

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2003

Since its inception in 1960, The Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court's most significant decisions. Recent volumes have considered issues such as the 2000 elections in Florida, Federalism and state sovereignty, the Boerne v. Flores case, and numerous Fourth Amendment issues. Distinguished participants analyze current and previous public issues, sentiments, and the implications of Court decisions.
[more]
cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2003

The Supreme Court Review, 2003

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2004

The Supreme Court Review receives accolades for providing authoritative discussion of the Court's most significant decisions and their resonating impacts. Recent scholarship addresses school vouchers via Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, Federalism and state sovereignty, the current state of political parties, and judicial passivity. Distinguished participants across the field of Law analyze current and previous public issues, sentiments, and implications addressed under Court consideration.
[more]
cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2004

The Supreme Court Review, 2004

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2005

Since its inception in 1960, The Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussions of the Court's most significant decisions. Distinguished participants hereanalyze current and previous public issues and sentiments and discuss the implications of court decisions.
[more]
cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2005

The Supreme Court Review, 2005

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2006

For forty-five years The Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court’s most significant decisions. Recent volumes have considered issues such as the 2000 presidential election, cross-burning, federalism and state sovereignty, the United States v. American Library Association case, and numerous First and Fourth amendment cases. Distinguished participants analyze current and previous concerns and attitudes and discuss the implications of court decisions.  
[more]
cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2006

The Supreme Court Review, 2006

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2007

For forty-five years The Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court’s most significant decisions. Recent volumes have considered issues such as the 2000 presidential election, cross-burning, federalism and state sovereignty, the United States v. American Library Association case, and numerous First and Fourth amendment cases.
[more]
cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2007

The Supreme Court Review, 2007

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2008

For forty-five years, The Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court’s most significant decisions. Recent volumes have considered such issues as the 2000 presidential election, cross burning, federalism and state sovereignty, the United States v. American Library Association case, failed Supreme Court nominations, and numerous First and Fourth amendment cases.
[more]
cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2008

The Supreme Court Review, 2008

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2009

For forty-eight years, The Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court’s most significant decisions. The Review is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, at the forefront of studies of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. Recent volumes have considered such issues as the 2000 presidential election, cross burning, federalism and state sovereignty, the United States v. American Library Association case, failed Supreme Court nominations, and numerous First and Fourth amendment cases.

[more]
cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2009

The Supreme Court Review, 2009

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2010

For forty-nine years, the Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court’s most significant decisions. The Review is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, one that strives to keep on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. Recent volumes have considered such issues as the 2000 presidential election, cross burning, federalism and state sovereignty, the United States v. American Library Association case, failed Supreme Court nominations, and numerous First and Fourth amendment cases.
[more]
cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2010

The Supreme Court Review, 2010

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2011

[more]
cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2011

The Supreme Court Review, 2011

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2012

For fifty years, The Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court’s most significant decisions. The Review is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. Recent volumes have considered such issues as post-9/11 security, the 2000 presidential election, cross burning, federalism and state sovereignty, failed Supreme Court nominations, and numerous First and Fourth amendment cases.

[more]
cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2012

The Supreme Court Review, 2012

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2013

For fifty years, The Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the court's most significant decisions. The Review is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. Recent volumes have considered such issues as post-9/11 security, the 2000 presidential election, cross-burning, federalism and state sovereignty, failed Supreme Court nominations, and numerous First- and Fourth-Amendment cases.
 

[more]
cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2013

The Supreme Court Review, 2013

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2014

For fifty years, The Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court's most significant decisions. The Review is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. Recent volumes have considered such issues as post-9/11 security, the 2000 presidential election, cross burning, federalism and state sovereignty, failed Supreme Court nominations, the battles concerning same-sex marriage, and numerous First and Fourth amendment cases.
[more]
cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2014

The Supreme Court Review, 2014

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2015

For more than fifty years, The Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court's most significant decisions. An in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, The Supreme Court Review keeps at the forefront of the reforms and interpretations of American law. Recent volumes have considered such issues as post-9/11 security, the 2000 presidential election, cross burning, federalism and state sovereignty, failed Supreme Court nominations, the battles concerning same-sex marriage, and numerous First and Fourth Amendment cases.
[more]
cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2015

The Supreme Court Review, 2015

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2016

For more than fifty years, The Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. The Supreme Court Review is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. It is written by and for legal academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians, economists, policy planners, and sociologists.
[more]
cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2016

The Supreme Court Review, 2016

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2017

For more than fifty years, The Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court’s most significant decisions. The Supreme Court Review is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. It is written by and for legal academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians, economists, policy planners, and sociologists.
 
[more]
cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2017

The Supreme Court Review, 2017

Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2018

Since it first appeared in 1960, The Supreme Court Review (SCR) has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. SCR is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. SCR is written by and for legal academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians, economists, policy planners, and sociologists.
 
[more]
cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2018

The Supreme Court Review, 2018

Edited by David A. Strauss, Geoffrey R. Stone, and Justin Driver

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2019

Since it first appeared in 1960, The Supreme Court Review (SCR) has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. SCR is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. SCR is written by and for legal academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians, economists, policy planners, and sociologists.
 
This year’s volume features prominent scholars assessing major legal events, including:
 
Mark Tushnet on President Trump’s “Muslim Ban”
Kate Andrias on Union Fees in the Public Sector
Cass R. Sunstein on Chevron without Chevron
Tracey Maclin on the Fourth Amendment and Unauthorized Drivers
Frederick Schauer on Precedent
Pamela Karlan on Gay Equality and Racial Equality
Randall Kennedy on Palmer v. Thompson
Lisa Marshall Manheim and Elizabeth G. Porter on Voter Suppression
Melissa Murray on Masterpiece Cakeshop
Vikram David Amar on Commandeering
Laura K. Donohue on Carpenter, Precedent, and Originalism
Evan Caminker on Carpenter and Stability 
[more]
cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2019

The Supreme Court Review, 2019

Edited by David A. Strauss, Geoffrey R. Stone, and Justin Driver

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2020

Since it first appeared in 1960, The Supreme Court Review (SCR) has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. SCR is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. SCR is written by and for legal academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians, economists, policy planners, and sociologists.
 
This year’s volume features incisive assessments of major legal events, including:
 
Gillian E. Metzger on The Roberts Court's Administrative Law
Paul Butler on Peremptory Strikes in Mississippi v. Flowers
Nicholas O. Stephanopoulos on Partisan Gerrymandering
Kent Greenfield on Hate Speech
Jennifer M. Chacon on Department of Commerce v. New York
Micah Schwartzman & Nelson Tebbe on Establishment Clause Appeasement
William Baude on Precedent and Originalism
Linda Greenhouse on The Supreme Court’s Challenge to Civil Society
James T. Kloppenberg on James Madison
 
[more]
cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2020

The Supreme Court Review, 2020

Edited by David A. Strauss, Geoffrey R. Stone, and Justin Driver

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2021

Since it first appeared in 1960, The Supreme Court Review (SCR) has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. SCR is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. SCR is written by and for legal academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians, economists, policy planners, and sociologists.

This year’s volume features incisive assessments of major legal events, including:

Cristina M. Rodríguez on the Political Significance of Law
Martha Minow on Little Sisters of the Poor
Cass R. Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule on the Unitary Executive
Cary Franklin on Living Textualism
David A. Strauss on Sexual Orientation and the Dynamics of Discrimination
Saikrishna Bangalore Prakash on the Executive’s Privileges and Immunities
Reva B. Siegel on Abortion Restrictions
Maggie Blackhawk on McGirt v. Oklahoma
Richard J. Lazarus on Advocacy History

[more]
cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2021

The Supreme Court Review, 2021

Edited by David A. Strauss, Geoffrey R. Stone, Justin Driver, and William Baude

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2022

The latest volume in the Supreme Court Review series.

Since it first appeared in 1960, the Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. SCR is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, analyzing the origins, reforms, and modern interpretations of American law. SCR is written by and for legal academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians, economists, policy planners, and sociologists. 
[more]
cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2022

The Supreme Court Review, 2022

Edited by David A. Strauss, Geoffrey R. Stone, Justin Driver, and William Baude

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2023

An annual peer-reviewed law journal covering the legal implications of decisions by the Supreme Court of the United States.

Since it first appeared in 1960, the Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. SCR is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, analyzing the origins, reforms, and modern interpretations of American law. SCR is written by and for legal academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians, economists, policy planners, and sociologists.
[more]
cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2023

The Supreme Court Review, 2023

Edited by David A. Strauss, Geoffrey R. Stone, Justin Driver, and William Baude

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2024

An annual peer-reviewed law journal covering the legal implications of decisions by the Supreme Court of the United States.
 
Since it first appeared in 1960, the Supreme Court Review (SCR) has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court’s most significant decisions. SCR is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, analyzing the origins, reforms, and modern interpretations of American law. SCR is written by and for legal academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians, economists, policy planners, and sociologists.
 
[more]
cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2024

The Supreme Court Review, 2024

Edited by David A. Strauss, Geoffrey R. Stone, Justin Driver, and William Baude

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2025

An annual peer-reviewed law journal covering the legal implications of decisions by the Supreme Court of the United States.
 
Since it first appeared in 1960, The Supreme Court Review (SCR) has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court’s most significant decisions. SCR is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, analyzing the origins, reforms, and modern interpretations of American law. SCR is written by and for legal academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians, economists, policy planners, and sociologists.
[more]
cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2025

The Supreme Court Review, 2025

Edited by David A. Strauss, Geoffrey R. Stone, Justin Driver, and William Baude

University of Chicago Press Journals, 2026

An annual peer-reviewed law journal covering the legal implications of decisions by the Supreme Court of the United States.
 
Since it first appeared in 1960, the Supreme Court Review (SCR) has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court’s most significant decisions. SCR is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, analyzing the origins, reforms, and modern interpretations of American law. SCR is written by and for legal academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians, economists, policy planners, and sociologists.

[more]