front cover of Machine
Machine
Thomas Pringle
University of Minnesota Press, 2018

On the social consequences of machines

Automation, animation, and ecosystems are terms of central media-philosophical concern in today’s society of humans and machines. This volume describes the social consequences of machines as a mediating concept for the animation of life and automation of technology. Bernard Stiegler’s automatic society illustrates how digital media networks establish a new proletariat of knowledge workers. Gertrud Koch offers the animation of the technical to account for the pathological relations that arise between people and their devices. And Thomas Pringle synthesizes how automation and animation explain the history of intellectual exchanges that led to the hybrid concept of the ecosystem, a term that blends computer and natural science. All three contributions analyse how categories of life and technology become mixed in governmental policies, economic exploitation and pathologies of everyday life thereby both curiously and critically advancing the term that underlies those new developments: ‘machine.’ 

[more]

front cover of Philosophies singulières
Philosophies singulières
Conversation avec Michaël Crevoisier
Mehdi Belhaj Kacem and Bernard Stiegler
Diaphanes, 2021
Rarement les philosophes dont la formation s’est faite à l'écart de l’université se sont entretenus. Le temps d’une conversation Mehdi Belhaj Kacem et Bernard Stiegler se sont prêtés au jeu, échangeant à propos de ce qui les lie à la philosophie. Inévitablement, la mort tragique de Bernard Stiegler survenue un an plus tard, donne à lire ce texte avec un regard affecté. D’autant plus qu’ici, l’enthousiasme des échanges nous fait sentir le mouvement vivant de philosophies à l’œuvre, continuant de se constituer en système.

En effet, bien que les œuvres de ces deux auteurs soient singulières, l’une et l’autre procèdent d’une même exigence qui les place au centre de la tradition philosophique : produire un système conceptuel qui donne à penser la nouveauté de la situation historique. À quoi bon la cohérence d’une philosophie qui ne nous dirait rien de ce qu’est devenu le monde ? Que vaudrait l’abstraction conceptuelle si celle-ci n’était pas au service de la compréhension de ce qui nous transforme ? Ainsi, les deux auteurs nous appellent à ne pas oublier : l’enjeu de la philosophie n’est pas la philosophie. Cette exigence critique, la présente conversation la réfléchit à bras le corps, non sans détours et tourments, mais avec franchise et esprit de liberté.
[more]

front cover of The Technique of Thought
The Technique of Thought
Nancy, Laruelle, Malabou, and Stiegler after Naturalism
Ian James
University of Minnesota Press, 2019

Interrogating the work of four contemporary French philosophers to rethink philosophy’s relationship to science and science’s relationship to reality

The Technique of Thought explores the relationship between philosophy and science as articulated in the work of four contemporary French thinkers—Jean-Luc Nancy, François Laruelle, Catherine Malabou, and Bernard Stiegler. Situating their writings within both contemporary scientific debates and the philosophy of science, Ian James elaborates a philosophical naturalism that is notably distinct from the Anglo-American tradition. The naturalism James proposes also diverges decisively from the ways in which continental philosophy has previously engaged with the sciences. He explores the technical procedures and discursive methods used by each of the four thinkers as distinct “techniques of thought” that approach scientific understanding and knowledge experimentally.  

Moving beyond debates about the constructed nature of scientific knowledge, The Technique of Thought argues for a strong, variably configured, and entirely novel scientific realism. By bringing together post-phenomenological perspectives concerning individual or collective consciousness and first-person qualitative experience with science’s focus on objective and third-person quantitative knowledge, James tracks the emergence of a new image of the sciences and of scientific practice. 

Stripped of aspirations toward total mastery of the universe or a “grand theory of everything,” this renewed scientific worldview, along with the simultaneous reconfiguration of philosophy’s relationship to science, opens up new ways of interrogating immanent reality.

[more]


Send via email Share on Facebook Share on Twitter