David Schoem
University of Michigan Press, 2005
Anne Beaufort
Utah State University Press, 2007
Composition research consistently demonstrates that the social context of writing determines the majority of conventions any writer must observe. Still, most universities organize the required first-year composition course as if there were an intuitive set of general writing "skills" usable across academic and work-world settings.
In College Writing and Beyond: A New Framework for University Writing Instruction, Anne Beaufort reports on a longitudinal study comparing one student’s experience in FYC, in history, in engineering, and in his post-college writing. Her data illuminate the struggle of college students to transfer what they learn about "general writing" from one context to another. Her findings suggest ultimately not that we must abolish FYC, but that we must go beyond even genre theory in reconceiving it.
Accordingly, Beaufort would argue that the FYC course should abandon its hope to teach a sort of general academic discourse, and instead should systematically teach strategies of responding to contextual elements that impinge on the writing situation. Her data urge attention to issues of learning transfer, and to developmentally sound linkages in writing instruction within and across disciplines. Beaufort advocates special attention to discourse community theory, for its power to help students perceive and understand the context of writing.
Karpowitz, Daniel
Rutgers University Press, 2017
Carl Abbott
University Press of Colorado, 2013
Patricia Lynne
Utah State University Press, 2004
In a provocative book-length essay, Patricia Lynne argues that most programmatic assessment of student writing in U.S. public and higher education is conceived in the terms of mid-20th century positivism. Since composition as a field had found its most compatible home in constructivism, she asks, why do compositionists import a conceptual frame for assessment that is incompatible with composition theory?
By casting this as a clash of paradigms, Lynne is able to highlight the ways in which each theory can and cannot influence the shape of assessment within composition. She laments, as do many in composition, that the objectively oriented paradigm of educational assessment theory subjugates and discounts the very social constructionist principles that empower composition pedagogy. Further, Lynne criticizes recent practice for accommodating the big business of educational testing—especially for capitulating to the discourse of positivism embedded in terms like "validity" and "reliability." These terms and concepts, she argues, have little theoretical significance within composition studies, and their technical and philosophical import are downplayed by composition assessment scholars.
There is a need, Lynne says, for terms of assessment that are native to composition. To open this needed discussion within the field, she analyzes cutting-edge assessment efforts, including the work of Broad and Haswell, and she advances a set of alternate terms for evaluating assessment practices, a set of terms grounded in constructivism and composition.
Coming to Terms is ambitious and principled, and it takes a controversial stand on important issues. This strong new volume in assessment theory will be of serious interest to assessment specialists and their students, to composition theorists, and to those now mounting assessments in their own programs.
Edited by Carlos Rodriguez
Michigan Publishing Services, 2017
Rebecca M. Callahan
Russell Sage Foundation, 2013
John M. Swales & Christine B. Feak
University of Michigan Press, 2012
The Commentary for the third edition of this successful guide to writing has been revised and expanded in many ways to provide more support for instructors; this includes additional tasks for Units Two and Four to supplement the main text. However, the collegial tone established in previous Commentaries between Swales & Feak and instructors has been retained.
This volume contains commentaries on each of the eight units plus the two appendixes. The format for each unit includes
Christine B. Feak and John M. Swales
University of Michigan Press, 2027
Now in its 4th edition, the Commentary for Academic Writing for Graduate Students remains an important companion text. Useful for instructors as well as students and scholars using Academic Writing for Graduate Students for self-study, the Commentary includes a synopsis of what each unit attempts to achieve, further discussion of certain points, and sample responses to the more controlled tasks. Many of the responses or model texts come directly from class discussion or from submitted homework, which students generously offered for inclusion. In response to numerous requests, the authors have expanded the number of teaching suggestions included at the end of each unit for this edition.
Dr. Julia Khrebtan-Hörhager
University of Michigan Press, 2023
Gerald M. Phillips
Southern Illinois University Press, 1991
Gerald M. Phillips draws on his twenty-five-year, five-thousand-client experience with the Pennsylvania State University Reticence Program to present a new theory of modification of “inept” communication behavior.
That experience has convinced Phillips that communication is arbitrary and rulebound rather than a process of inspiration. He demonstrates that communication problems can be described as errors that can be detected and classified in order to fit a remediation pattern. Regardless of the source of error, the remedy is to train the individual to avoid or eliminate errors—thus, orderly procedure will result in competent performance.
Inept communicators must be made aware of the obligations and constraints imposed by deep structures that require us to achieve a degree of formal order in our language, without which our discourse becomes incomprehensible.
Elizabeth E. Shively
SBL Press, 2016
Using Mark as a test case, scholars address questions like: How should my research and my approach to the text play out in the classroom? What differences should my academic context and my students' expectations make? How should new approaches and innovations inform interpretation and teaching? This resource enables biblical studies instructors to explore various interpretative approaches and to begin to engage pedagogical issues in our changing world.
Features:
Edited by Patrick E. Marlow and Sabine Siekmann
University of Arizona Press, 2013
Pat Crawford
Michigan State University Press, 2020
Linda Flower
Southern Illinois University Press, 2008
Community Literacy and the Rhetoric of Public Engagement explores the critical practice of intercultural inquiry and rhetorical problem-solving that encourages urban writers and college mentors alike to take literate action. Author Linda Flower documents an innovative experiment in community literacy, the Community Literacy Center in Pittsburgh, and posits a powerful and distinctively rhetorical model of community engagement and pedagogy for both marginalized and privileged writers and speakers. In addition, she articulates a theory of local publics and explores the transformative potential of alternative discourses and counter-public performances.
In presenting a comprehensive pedagogy for literate action, the volume offers strategies for talking and collaborating across difference, forconducting an intercultural inquiry that draws out situated knowledge and rival interpretations of shared problems, and for writing and speaking to advocate for personal and public transformation. Flower describes the competing scripts for social engagement, empowerment, public deliberation, and agency that characterize the interdisciplinary debate over models of social engagement.
Extending the Community Literacy Center’s initial vision of community literacy first published a decade ago, Community Literacy and the Rhetoric of Public Engagement makes an important contribution to theoretical conversations about the nature of the public sphere while providing practical instruction in how all people can speak publicly for values and visions of change.
Winner, 2009 Rhetoric Society of America Book Award
James Youniss and Miranda Yates
University of Chicago Press, 1997
The University of Chicago Press
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2021
The University of Chicago Press
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2022
The University of Chicago Press
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2022
The University of Chicago Press
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2022
The University of Chicago Press
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2022
The University of Chicago Press
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2023
The University of Chicago Press
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2023
The University of Chicago Press
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2023
The University of Chicago Press
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2023
The University of Chicago Press
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2023
The University of Chicago Press
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2024
The University of Chicago Press
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2024
The University of Chicago Press
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2024
The University of Chicago Press
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2024
The University of Chicago Press
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2025
The University of Chicago Press
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2025
The University of Chicago Press
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2025
The University of Chicago Press
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2025
The University of Chicago Press
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2026
The University of Chicago Press
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2026
The University of Chicago Press
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2026
Kaz Mazurek
Gallaudet University Press, 1994
Kathryn Riley
University College London, 2022
Stephen Arons
University of Massachusetts Press, 1986
John T. Hamilton
University of Chicago Press, 2022
Sara Ahmed
Duke University Press, 2021
Lee Anderson and Kathy Penningroth
University of Michigan Press, 1998
Vincent Tinto
University of Chicago Press, 2012
Even as the number of students attending college has more than doubled in the past forty years, it is still the case that nearly half of all college students in the United States will not complete their degree within six years. It is clear that much remains to be done toward improving student success. For more than twenty years, Vincent Tinto’s pathbreaking book Leaving College has been recognized as the definitive resource on student retention in higher education. Now, with Completing College, Tinto offers administrators a coherent framework with which to develop and implement programs to promote completion.
Deftly distilling an enormous amount of research, Tinto identifies the essential conditions enabling students to succeed and continue on within institutions. Especially during the early years, he shows that students thrive in settings that pair high expectations for success with structured academic, social, and financial support, provide frequent feedback and assessments of their performance, and promote their active involvement with other students and faculty. And while these conditions may be worked on and met at different institutional levels, Tinto points to the classroom as the center of student education and life, and therefore the primary target for institutional action.
Improving retention rates continues to be among the most widely studied fields in higher education, and Completing College carefully synthesizes the latest research and, most importantly, translates it into practical steps that administrators can take to enhance student success.
Kristine L. Blair
University Press of Colorado, 2018
Kristin L. Arola and Anne Frances Wysocki
Utah State University Press, 2012
“What any body is—and is able to do—cannot be disentangled from the media we use to consume and produce texts.” ---from the Introduction.
Kristin Arola and Anne Wysocki argue that composing in new media is composing the body—is embodiment. In Composing (Media) = Composing (Embodiment), they havebrought together a powerful set of essays that agree on the need for compositionists—and their students—to engage with a wide range of new media texts. These chapters explore how texts of all varieties mediate and thereby contribute to the human experiences of communication, of self, the body, and composing. Sample assignments and activities exemplify how this exploration might proceed in the writing classroom.
Contributors here articulate ways to understand how writing enables the experience of our bodies as selves, and at the same time to see the work of (our) writing in mediating selves to make them accessible to institutional perceptions and constraints. These writers argue that what a body does, and can do, cannot be disentangled from the media we use, nor from the times and cultures and technologies with which we engage.
To the discipline of composition, this is an important discussion because it clarifies the impact/s of literacy on citizens, freedoms, and societies. To the classroom, it is important because it helps compositionists to support their students as they enact, learn, and reflect upon their own embodied and embodying writing.
Cindy Johanek
Utah State University Press, 2000
Cindy Johanek offers a new perspective on the ideological conflict between qualitative and quantitative research approaches, and the theories of knowledge that inform them. With a paradigm that is sensitive to the context of one's research questions, she argues, scholars can develop less dichotomous forms that invoke the strengths of both research traditions. Context-oriented approaches can lift the narrative from beneath the numbers in an experimental study, for example, or bring the useful clarity of numbers to an ethnographic study.
A pragmatic scholar, Johanek moves easily across the boundaries that divide the field, and argues for contextualist theory as a lens through which to view composition research. This approach brings with it a new focus, she writes. "This new focus will call us to attend to the contexts in which rhetorical issues and research issues converge, producing varied forms, many voices, and new knowledge, indeed reconstructing a discipline that will be simultaneously focused on its tasks, its knowledge-makers, and its students."
Composing Research is a work full of personal voice and professional commitment and will be a welcome addition to the research methods classroom and to the composition researcher's own bookshelf.
2000 Outstanding Scholarship Award from the International Writing Centers Association.
Jessica Yood
Utah State University Press, 2024
Edited by Winifred Bryan Horner
University of Chicago Press, 1983
Rachel McCabe
Utah State University Press, 2023