"Gorelick’s initiation of his readers into this ethics of reading, and of “reading otherwise,” is one of the great services to thought that his book provides . . . Prying a minimal distance from monadic self-enclosure and from the social link, for Gorelick, requires an ethics of reading that dissolves the distinction between the critical and the creative. It is here, in this critical-creative practice that construction is authored, and it is here that the 'invitation to think literature with psychoanalysis is most apparent.'"—European Journal of Psychoanalysis
"Gorelick’s book refuses the rote application of psychoanalytic theory to otherwise recalcitrant literary works. More specifically, Gorelick argues for a psychoanalytic criticism that is not exactly a method—i.e., a series of general rules or techniques that can be applied readily to otherwise particular and disparate cases—but rather an “ethics,” one focused, as in the analytic session itself, on listening to, and taking seriously, the aspects of a discourse (whether it be a patient’s free associations or a written work’s poetry) that appear, at least at first, as odd, singular, out of place, disruptive, uncanny,
or disavowed." —Eighteenth-Century Studies
"This is the work of a confident and erudite thinker, offering startlingly brilliant formulations on every page and lucid distinctions that powerfully integrate philosophy, politics, and poetics. Nathan Gorelick faithfully champions the literary in prose that is commanding and often beautiful.” —Anna Kornbluh, University of Illinois, Chicago
“Nathan Gorelick’s bold intervention into the interdisciplinary framing of psychoanalysis explores the ways that literature informs its critical capacity. As he moves from conception to illustration, his textual work rethinks the Enlightenment, resituates psychoanalysis, and repositions literature’s critical mission.” —Michael J. Shapiro, University of Hawai’i, Manoa