front cover of Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 11
Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 11
Edited by Francesco Parisi and Dan Polsby
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2004
Supreme Court Economic Review is a peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary journal focusing on economic consequences, precedents, and reasoning based on the work and law-defining decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court. The scholarship in Volume 11 includes evolution of patent law at the Federal Circuit and Supreme Court levels, censorship of economic theory, probability errors regarding tort and contract law, the psychology of punishment, and more.
[more]
front cover of Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 12
Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 12
Edited by Francesco Parisi and Daniel D. Polsby
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2004
The Supreme Court Economic Review is a peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary series focusing on economic consequences, precedents, and reasoning based on the work and decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court. Recent topics have included the evolution of patent law at the Federal Circuit and Supreme Court levels, censorship of economic theory, probability errors regarding tort and contract law, the psychology of punishment, and more.
[more]
front cover of Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 13
Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 13
Edited by Francesco Parisi and Daniel D. Polsby
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2005
The Supreme Court Economic Review is a peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary series focusing on economic consequences, precedents, and reasoning based on the work and decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court. Recent topics have included the evolution of patent law at the Federal Circuit and Supreme Court levels, censorship of economic theory, probability errors regarding tort and contract law, the psychology of punishment, and more.
[more]
front cover of Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 14
Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 14
Edited by Francesco Parisi, Daniel D. Polsby, and Lloyd R. Cohen
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2006
Supreme Court Economic Review is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed series focusing on the economic consequences, precedents, and reasoning behind  United States Supreme Court decisions. Recent books have covered the evolution of patent law at the Federal Circuit and Supreme Court levels, censorship of economic theory, probability errors regarding tort and contract law, the psychology of punishment, and more.
[more]
front cover of Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 15
Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 15
Edited by Francesco Parisi, Lloyd R. Cohen, and Daniel D. Polsby
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2007
Supreme Court Economic Review is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed series focusing on the economic consequences, precedents, and reasoning behind  United States Supreme Court decisions. Recent books have covered the evolution of patent law at the Federal Circuit and Supreme Court levels, censorship of economic theory, probability errors regarding tort and contract law, the psychology of punishment, and more.
[more]
front cover of Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 16
Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 16
Edited by Francesco Parisi, Lloyd R. Cohen, and Daniel D. Polsby
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2008
Supreme Court Economic Review is an interdisciplinary journal that seeks to provide a forum for scholarship in law and economics, public choice, and constitutional political economy. Its approach is broad ranging and contributions employ explicit or implicit economic reasoning for the analysis of legal issues, with special attention to Supreme Court decisions, judicial process, and institutional design. Volume 16 contributors are Guiseppe Dari-Mattiacci, Vincy Fon, Nuno Garoupa, Keith N. Hylton, Sheldon Kimmel, Tonja Jacobi, David M. Levy, John O. McGinnis, Sandra J. Peart, Michael Rappaport, Neil S. Siegel, and Todd J. Zywicki.
[more]
front cover of Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 17
Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 17
Edited by Ilya Somin and Todd J. Zywicki
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2009
Supreme Court Economic Review is an interdisciplinary journal that seeks to provide a forum for scholarship in law and economics, public choice, and constitutional political economy. Its approach is wide-ranging, and contributions employ explicit or implicit economic reasoning for the analysis of legal issues, with special attention to Supreme Court decisions and questions of judicial process and institutional design. 
[more]
front cover of Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 18
Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 18
Edited by Ilya Somin and Todd J. Zywicki
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2010

Supreme Court Economic Review is an interdisciplinary journal that provides a forum for scholarship in law and economics, public choice, and constitutional political economy. Its approach is broad-ranging and the contributions it brings together apply explicit or implicit economic reasoning to the analysis of legal issues before the court, with special attention to Supreme Court decisions, judicial process, and institutional design.

[more]
front cover of Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 19
Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 19
Edited by Ilya Somin and Todd J. Zywicki
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2011

Supreme Court Economic Review is an interdisciplinary journal that provides a forum for scholarship in law and economics, public choice, and constitutional political economy. Its approach is broad-ranging and the contributions it brings together apply explicit or implicit economic reasoning to the analysis of legal issues before the court, with special attention to Supreme Court decisions, judicial process, and institutional design.

[more]
front cover of Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 20
Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 20
Edited by Ilya Somin and Todd J. Zywicki
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2012
The Supreme Court Economic Review is an interdisciplinary journal that seeks to provide a forum for scholarship in law and economics, public choice, and constitutional political economy. Its approach is broad ranging, and contributions employ explicit or implicit economic reasoning for the analysis of legal issues, with special attention to Supreme Court decisions, judicial process, and institutional design. 
[more]
front cover of Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 21
Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 21
Edited by Ilya Somin, Joshua Wright, and Todd J. Zywicki
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2014
Supreme Court Economic Review is an interdisciplinary journal that seeks to provide a forum for scholarship in law and economics, public choice, and constitutional political economy. Its approach is broad ranging and contributions employ explicit or implicit economic reasoning for the analysis of legal issues, with special attention to Supreme Court decisions, judicial process, and institutional design.
[more]
front cover of Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 22
Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 22
Edited by Michael Greve, Thomas Hazlett, and Todd J. Zywicki
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2015
Supreme Court Economic Review is an interdisciplinary journal that seeks to provide a forum for scholarship in law and economics, public choice, and constitutional political economy. Its approach is broad ranging and contributions employ explicit or implicit economic reasoning for the analysis of legal issues, with special attention to Supreme Court decisions, judicial process, and institutional design.
[more]
front cover of Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 23
Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 23
Edited by Todd J. Zywicki, Michael S. Greve, and Thomas W. Hazlett
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2016
Supreme Court Economic Review is a faculty-edited, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary series that applies world class economic and legal scholarship to the work of the Supreme Court of the United States. Contributions typically provide an economic analysis of the events that generated the Court's cases, its functioning as an organization, the reasoning the Court employs in reaching its decisions, and the societal impact of these verdicts. Beyond academic analysis, SCER contributors stimulate interest in the economic dimension of the Supreme Court and explore solutions for its manifold and complex problems.
[more]
front cover of Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 24
Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 24
Edited by Jonathan Klick and Eric Helland
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2018
The Supreme Court Economic Review is a faculty-edited, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary law and economics series with a particular focus on economic and social science analysis of judicial decision making, institutional analysis of law and legal structures, political economy and public choice issues regarding courts and other decision-makers, and the relationship between legal and political institutions and the institutions of a free society governed by constitutions and the rule of law. Contributors include renowned legal scholars, economists, and policy-makers, and consistently ranks among the most influential journals of law and economics.
[more]
front cover of Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 25
Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 25
Edited by Keith Hylton
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2019
The Supreme Court Economic Review is a faculty-edited, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary law and economics series with a particular focus on economic and social science analysis of judicial decision making, institutional analysis of law and legal structures, political economy and public choice issues regarding courts and other decision-makers, and the relationship between legal and political institutions and the institutions of a free society governed by constitutions and the rule of law. Contributors include renowned legal scholars, economists, and policy-makers, and consistently ranks among the most influential journals of law and economics.
[more]
front cover of Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 26
Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 26
Edited by Murat C. Mungan
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2019
The Supreme Court Economic Review (SCER) is a faculty-edited, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary law and economics series. The journal has a particular focus on economic and social science analysis of judicial decision-making, institutional analysis of law and legal structures, political economy and public choice issues regarding courts and other decision-makers, and the relationship between legal and political institutions and the institutions of a free society governed by constitutions and the rule of law. The series also publishes special symposium issues that build on SCER's traditional focus on the intersection between law and economics. The contributors include renowned legal scholars, economists, and policy-makers, and consistently ranks among the most influential journals of law and economics.
[more]
front cover of Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 27
Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 27
Edited by Murat C. Mungan
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2020
The Supreme Court Economic Review (SCER) is a faculty-edited, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary law and economics series. The journal has a particular focus on economic and social science analysis of judicial decision-making, institutional analysis of law and legal structures, political economy and public choice issues regarding courts and other decision-makers, and the relationship between legal and political institutions and the institutions of a free society governed by constitutions and the rule of law. The series also publishes special symposium issues that build on SCER's traditional focus on the intersection between law and economics. The contributors include renowned legal scholars, economists, and policy-makers, and consistently ranks among the most influential journals of law and economics.
[more]
front cover of Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 28
Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 28
Edited by Murat C. Mungan
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2021
The Supreme Court Economic Review (SCER) is a faculty-edited, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary law and economics series. The journal has a particular focus on economic and social science analysis of judicial decision-making, institutional analysis of law and legal structures, political economy and public choice issues regarding courts and other decision-makers, and the relationship between legal and political institutions and the institutions of a free society governed by constitutions and the rule of law. The series also publishes special symposium issues that build on SCER's traditional focus on the intersection between law and economics. The contributors include renowned legal scholars, economists, and policy-makers, and consistently ranks among the most influential journals of law and economics.
[more]
front cover of Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 4
Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 4
Edited by Ernest Gellhorn and Harold Demsetz
University of Chicago Press Journals, 1995
This interdisciplinary review series brings together the perspectives of legal scholars and economists on the work of the United States Supreme Court. Contributions to the SCER provide an economic analysis of the situations and events that generate a case or group of cases. Articles often consider the implicit or explicit economic reasoning employed by the U. S. Supreme Court to reach its decisions, and the economic consequences of the Court's decisions. The SCER also promotes analyses dealing with the functioning of the Court as an organization. As such, it is essential reading for legal scholars, economists, policy makers, and scholars specializing in law and economics.

Appearing in Volume 4 are "The Insurance Antitrust Suits and the Control of Competition in Insurance," by George L. Priest; "Daubert's Debut: The Supreme Court and the Economics of Scientific Evidence," by Jeffrey S. Parker; "The Supreme Court's Predation Odyssey: From Fruit Pies to Cigarettes," by Donald J. Boudreaux, Kenneth G. Elzinga, and David E. Mills; "The Constitutional Conception of the Corporation," by Larry E. Ribstein; "Interpreting Health Care Cost Containment Legislation: Good Samaritan Hospital v. Shalala and Relative Institutional Competence," by Simonetti Samuels; and "O'Melveny & Meyers v. FDIC: Imputation of Fraud and Optimal Monitoring," by A. V. Pritchard
[more]
front cover of Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 5
Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 5
Edited by Harold Demsetz, Ernest Gellhorn, and Nelson Lund
University of Chicago Press Journals, 1997
This interdisciplinary review series provides an economic analysis of
the situations and events that generate a case or group of cases decided
by the United States Supreme Court, the implicit or explicit economic
reasoning employed by the Court to reach its decisions, and the economic
consequences of the Court's decisions.

SCER is sponsored by the Law & Economics Center of the George
Mason University School of Law.
[more]
front cover of Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 6
Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 6
Edited by Harold Demsetz, Ernest Gellhorn, and Nelson Lund
University of Chicago Press Journals, 1998
This interdisciplinary review series provides an economic analysis of cases decided by the United States Supreme Court, the implicit or explicit economic reasoning employed by the Court, and the economic consequences of the Court's decisions.
[more]
front cover of Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 7
Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 7
Edited by Ernest Gellhorn and Larry Ribstein
University of Chicago Press Journals, 1999

front cover of Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 8
Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 8
Edited by Ernest Gellhorn and Larry Ribstein
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2000

front cover of Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 9
Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 9
Edited by Nelson Lund, Ernest Gellhorn, and Larry Ribstein
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2001
The Supreme Court Economic Review series applies economic and legal scholarship to the work of the United States Supreme Court. Contributions provide economic analyses of events that generate the Court's cases, its organizational functioning, its rationale, and the societal impact of these verdicts.
[more]
front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1960
The Supreme Court Review, 1960
Edited by Philip B. Kurland
University of Chicago Press Journals, 1960

front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1961
The Supreme Court Review, 1961
Edited by Philip B. Kurland
University of Chicago Press Journals, 1961

front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1962
The Supreme Court Review, 1962
Edited by Philip B. Kurland
University of Chicago Press Journals, 1962

front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1963
The Supreme Court Review, 1963
Edited by Philip B. Kurland
University of Chicago Press Journals, 1963

front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1966
The Supreme Court Review, 1966
Edited by Philip B. Kurland
University of Chicago Press Journals, 1966

front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1967
The Supreme Court Review, 1967
Edited by Philip B. Kurland
University of Chicago Press Journals, 1967

front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1968
The Supreme Court Review, 1968
Edited by Philip B. Kurland
University of Chicago Press Journals, 1968

front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1969
The Supreme Court Review, 1969
Edited by Philip B. Kurland
University of Chicago Press Journals, 1969

front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1970
The Supreme Court Review, 1970
Edited by Philip B. Kurland
University of Chicago Press Journals, 1970

front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1971
The Supreme Court Review, 1971
Edited by Philip B. Kurland
University of Chicago Press Journals, 1971

front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1973
The Supreme Court Review, 1973
Edited by Philip B. Kurland
University of Chicago Press Journals, 1974

front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1974
The Supreme Court Review, 1974
Edited by Philip B. Kurland
University of Chicago Press Journals, 1975

front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1975
The Supreme Court Review, 1975
Edited by Philip B. Kurland
University of Chicago Press Journals, 1976

front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1976
The Supreme Court Review, 1976
Edited by Philip B. Kurland
University of Chicago Press Journals, 1977

front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1977
The Supreme Court Review, 1977
Edited by Philip B. Kurland
University of Chicago Press Journals, 1978

front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1979
The Supreme Court Review, 1979
Edited by Philip B. Kurland
University of Chicago Press Journals, 1980

front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1981
The Supreme Court Review, 1981
Edited by Philip B. Kurland
University of Chicago Press Journals, 1982

front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1982
The Supreme Court Review, 1982
Edited by Philip B. Kurland
University of Chicago Press Journals, 1983

front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1983
The Supreme Court Review, 1983
Edited by Philip B. Kurland
University of Chicago Press Journals, 1984

front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1985
The Supreme Court Review, 1985
Edited by Philip B. Kurland
University of Chicago Press Journals, 1986

front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1986
The Supreme Court Review, 1986
Edited by Philip B. Kurland, Gerhard Casper, and Dennis J. Hutchinson
University of Chicago Press Journals, 1987

front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1987
The Supreme Court Review, 1987
Edited by Philip B. Kurland, Gerhard Casper, and Dennis J. Hutchinson
University of Chicago Press Journals, 1988

front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1988
The Supreme Court Review, 1988
Edited by Philip B. Kurland, Gerhard Casper, and Dennis J. Hutchinson
University of Chicago Press Journals, 1989

front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1989
The Supreme Court Review, 1989
Edited by Philip B. Kurland, Gerhard Casper, and Dennis J. Hutchinson
University of Chicago Press Journals, 1990

front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1990
The Supreme Court Review, 1990
Edited by Gerhard Casper and Dennis J. Hutchinson
University of Chicago Press Journals, 1991

front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1991
The Supreme Court Review, 1991
Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone
University of Chicago Press Journals, 1992

front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1992
The Supreme Court Review, 1992
Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone
University of Chicago Press Journals, 1993
Since it first appeared in 1960, the Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. Individual essays in the 1994 volume include articles by Craig M. Bradley on RICO and the first amendment; Bernard Schwartz on clear and present danger versus advocacy of unlawful action; William P. Marshall and Susan Gilles on the Supreme Court, the first amendment, and bad journalism; Paul Finkelman on Prigg v. Pennsylvania; Richard H. Fallon, Jr. on sexual harassment, content neutrality, and the first amendment; Lea Brilmayer on federalism, state authority, and the preemptive power of internal law; and C. Edwin Baker on Turner Broadcasting and content-based regulation of persons and presses.
[more]
front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1993
The Supreme Court Review, 1993
Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone
University of Chicago Press Journals, 1994
Since it first appeared in 1960, the Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. Individual essays in the 1994 volume include articles by Craig M. Bradley on RICO and the first amendment; Bernard Schwartz on clear and present danger versus advocacy of unlawful action; William P. Marshall and Susan Gilles on the Supreme Court, the first amendment, and bad journalism; Paul Finkelman on Prigg v. Pennsylvania; Richard H. Fallon, Jr. on sexual harassment, content neutrality, and the first amendment; Lea Brilmayer on federalism, state authority, and the preemptive power of internal law; and C. Edwin Baker on Turner Broadcasting and content-based regulation of persons and presses.
[more]
front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1994
The Supreme Court Review, 1994
Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone
University of Chicago Press Journals, 1995
Since it first appeared in 1960, the Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. Individual essays in the 1994 volume include articles by Craig M. Bradley on RICO and the first amendment; Bernard Schwartz on clear and present danger versus advocacy of unlawful action; William P. Marshall and Susan Gilles on the Supreme Court, the first amendment, and bad journalism; Paul Finkelman on Prigg v. Pennsylvania; Richard H. Fallon, Jr. on sexual harassment, content neutrality, and the first amendment; Lea Brilmayer on federalism, state authority, and the preemptive power of internal law; and C. Edwin Baker on Turner Broadcasting and content-based regulation of persons and presses.
[more]
front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1995
The Supreme Court Review, 1995
Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone
University of Chicago Press Journals, 1996

front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1996
The Supreme Court Review, 1996
Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone
University of Chicago Press Journals, 1997

front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1997
The Supreme Court Review, 1997
Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone
University of Chicago Press Journals, 1998

front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1998
The Supreme Court Review, 1998
Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone
University of Chicago Press Journals, 1999

front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 1999
The Supreme Court Review, 1999
Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2000
"Some of the best researched and most thoughtful criticisms of recent decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court."—Ethics

Since it first appeared in 1960, The Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. Consisting of diverse essays by distinguished lawyers, historians, and social scientists, each volume presents informed analyses of past and present opinions and discusses important public law issues that have come under Court consideration.


[more]
front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2000
The Supreme Court Review, 2000
Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2001
"Some of the best researched and most thoughtful criticism of recent decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court."—Ethics

The Supreme Court Review keeps you at the forefront of the Court's most significant decisions by surveying its origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law and compelling you to consider the impacts of legal institutions and judicial opinion. Diverse essays of informed analyses of past and present opinions document the complexities of the Court and relevant public law issues. Legal scholars, lawyers, judges, historians, political scientists, economists, and journalists have won acclaim for their contributions to each volume.
[more]
front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2001
The Supreme Court Review, 2001
Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2002
Since it first appeared in 1960, The Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. Consisting of diverse essays by distinguished lawyers, historians, and social scientists, each volume presents informed analyses of past and present opinions and discusses important public law issues that have come under Court consideration.
[more]
front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2002
The Supreme Court Review, 2002
Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2003
Since its inception in 1960, The Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court's most significant decisions. Recent volumes have considered issues such as the 2000 elections in Florida, Federalism and state sovereignty, the Boerne v. Flores case, and numerous Fourth Amendment issues. Distinguished participants analyze current and previous public issues, sentiments, and the implications of Court decisions.
[more]
front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2003
The Supreme Court Review, 2003
Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2004
The Supreme Court Review receives accolades for providing authoritative discussion of the Court's most significant decisions and their resonating impacts. Recent scholarship addresses school vouchers via Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, Federalism and state sovereignty, the current state of political parties, and judicial passivity. Distinguished participants across the field of Law analyze current and previous public issues, sentiments, and implications addressed under Court consideration.
[more]
front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2004
The Supreme Court Review, 2004
Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2005
Since its inception in 1960, The Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussions of the Court's most significant decisions. Distinguished participants hereanalyze current and previous public issues and sentiments and discuss the implications of court decisions.
[more]
front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2005
The Supreme Court Review, 2005
Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2006
For forty-five years The Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court’s most significant decisions. Recent volumes have considered issues such as the 2000 presidential election, cross-burning, federalism and state sovereignty, the United States v. American Library Association case, and numerous First and Fourth amendment cases. Distinguished participants analyze current and previous concerns and attitudes and discuss the implications of court decisions.  
[more]
front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2006
The Supreme Court Review, 2006
Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2007
For forty-five years The Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court’s most significant decisions. Recent volumes have considered issues such as the 2000 presidential election, cross-burning, federalism and state sovereignty, the United States v. American Library Association case, and numerous First and Fourth amendment cases.
[more]
front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2007
The Supreme Court Review, 2007
Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2008
For forty-five years, The Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court’s most significant decisions. Recent volumes have considered such issues as the 2000 presidential election, cross burning, federalism and state sovereignty, the United States v. American Library Association case, failed Supreme Court nominations, and numerous First and Fourth amendment cases.
[more]
front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2008
The Supreme Court Review, 2008
Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2009

For forty-eight years, The Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court’s most significant decisions. The Review is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, at the forefront of studies of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. Recent volumes have considered such issues as the 2000 presidential election, cross burning, federalism and state sovereignty, the United States v. American Library Association case, failed Supreme Court nominations, and numerous First and Fourth amendment cases.

[more]
logo for University of Chicago Press Journals
The Supreme Court Review, 2009
Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2010
For forty-nine years, the Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court’s most significant decisions. The Review is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, one that strives to keep on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. Recent volumes have considered such issues as the 2000 presidential election, cross burning, federalism and state sovereignty, the United States v. American Library Association case, failed Supreme Court nominations, and numerous First and Fourth amendment cases.
[more]
front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2010
The Supreme Court Review, 2010
Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2011

front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2011
The Supreme Court Review, 2011
Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2012
For fifty years, The Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court’s most significant decisions. The Review is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. Recent volumes have considered such issues as post-9/11 security, the 2000 presidential election, cross burning, federalism and state sovereignty, failed Supreme Court nominations, and numerous First and Fourth amendment cases.

[more]
front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2012
The Supreme Court Review, 2012
Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2013
For fifty years, The Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the court's most significant decisions. The Review is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. Recent volumes have considered such issues as post-9/11 security, the 2000 presidential election, cross-burning, federalism and state sovereignty, failed Supreme Court nominations, and numerous First- and Fourth-Amendment cases.
 

[more]
front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2013
The Supreme Court Review, 2013
Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2014
For fifty years, The Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court's most significant decisions. The Review is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. Recent volumes have considered such issues as post-9/11 security, the 2000 presidential election, cross burning, federalism and state sovereignty, failed Supreme Court nominations, the battles concerning same-sex marriage, and numerous First and Fourth amendment cases.
[more]
front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2014
The Supreme Court Review, 2014
Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2015
For more than fifty years, The Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court's most significant decisions. An in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, The Supreme Court Review keeps at the forefront of the reforms and interpretations of American law. Recent volumes have considered such issues as post-9/11 security, the 2000 presidential election, cross burning, federalism and state sovereignty, failed Supreme Court nominations, the battles concerning same-sex marriage, and numerous First and Fourth Amendment cases.
[more]
front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2015
The Supreme Court Review, 2015
Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2016
For more than fifty years, The Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. The Supreme Court Review is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. It is written by and for legal academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians, economists, policy planners, and sociologists.
[more]
front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2016
The Supreme Court Review, 2016
Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2017
For more than fifty years, The Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court’s most significant decisions. The Supreme Court Review is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. It is written by and for legal academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians, economists, policy planners, and sociologists.
 
[more]
front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2017
The Supreme Court Review, 2017
Edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2018
Since it first appeared in 1960, The Supreme Court Review (SCR) has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. SCR is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. SCR is written by and for legal academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians, economists, policy planners, and sociologists.
 
[more]
front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2018
The Supreme Court Review, 2018
Edited by David A. Strauss, Geoffrey R. Stone, and Justin Driver
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2019
Since it first appeared in 1960, The Supreme Court Review (SCR) has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. SCR is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. SCR is written by and for legal academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians, economists, policy planners, and sociologists.
 
This year’s volume features prominent scholars assessing major legal events, including:
 
Mark Tushnet on President Trump’s “Muslim Ban”
Kate Andrias on Union Fees in the Public Sector
Cass R. Sunstein on Chevron without Chevron
Tracey Maclin on the Fourth Amendment and Unauthorized Drivers
Frederick Schauer on Precedent
Pamela Karlan on Gay Equality and Racial Equality
Randall Kennedy on Palmer v. Thompson
Lisa Marshall Manheim and Elizabeth G. Porter on Voter Suppression
Melissa Murray on Masterpiece Cakeshop
Vikram David Amar on Commandeering
Laura K. Donohue on Carpenter, Precedent, and Originalism
Evan Caminker on Carpenter and Stability 
[more]
front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2019
The Supreme Court Review, 2019
Edited by David A. Strauss, Geoffrey R. Stone, and Justin Driver
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2020
Since it first appeared in 1960, The Supreme Court Review (SCR) has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. SCR is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. SCR is written by and for legal academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians, economists, policy planners, and sociologists.
 
This year’s volume features incisive assessments of major legal events, including:
 
Gillian E. Metzger on The Roberts Court's Administrative Law
Paul Butler on Peremptory Strikes in Mississippi v. Flowers
Nicholas O. Stephanopoulos on Partisan Gerrymandering
Kent Greenfield on Hate Speech
Jennifer M. Chacon on Department of Commerce v. New York
Micah Schwartzman & Nelson Tebbe on Establishment Clause Appeasement
William Baude on Precedent and Originalism
Linda Greenhouse on The Supreme Court’s Challenge to Civil Society
James T. Kloppenberg on James Madison
 
[more]
front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2020
The Supreme Court Review, 2020
Edited by David A. Strauss, Geoffrey R. Stone, and Justin Driver
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2021

Since it first appeared in 1960, The Supreme Court Review (SCR) has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. SCR is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. SCR is written by and for legal academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians, economists, policy planners, and sociologists.

This year’s volume features incisive assessments of major legal events, including:

Cristina M. Rodríguez on the Political Significance of Law
Martha Minow on Little Sisters of the Poor
Cass R. Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule on the Unitary Executive
Cary Franklin on Living Textualism
David A. Strauss on Sexual Orientation and the Dynamics of Discrimination
Saikrishna Bangalore Prakash on the Executive’s Privileges and Immunities
Reva B. Siegel on Abortion Restrictions
Maggie Blackhawk on McGirt v. Oklahoma
Richard J. Lazarus on Advocacy History

[more]
front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2021
The Supreme Court Review, 2021
Edited by David A. Strauss, Geoffrey R. Stone, Justin Driver, and William Baude
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2022
The latest volume in the Supreme Court Review series.

Since it first appeared in 1960, the Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. SCR is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, analyzing the origins, reforms, and modern interpretations of American law. SCR is written by and for legal academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians, economists, policy planners, and sociologists. 
[more]
front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2022
The Supreme Court Review, 2022
Edited by David A. Strauss, Geoffrey R. Stone, Justin Driver, and William Baude
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2023
An annual peer-reviewed law journal covering the legal implications of decisions by the Supreme Court of the United States.

Since it first appeared in 1960, the Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. SCR is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, analyzing the origins, reforms, and modern interpretations of American law. SCR is written by and for legal academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians, economists, policy planners, and sociologists.
[more]

Send via email Share on Facebook Share on Twitter