As “a study in continuity and contrast” this essay reconciles the indignant and tragic Galsworthy of The Man of Property with the ironically humorous Galsworthy of the more recent novels, and at the same time points out the evolutionary process by which his later mood and manner grew out of the earlier. Natalie Croman also succeeds admirably in the difficult task of defining the later Galsworthy in terms of the earlier philosopher. In connection with this pamphlet we would call attention to earlier issues of the series, which forms a noteworthy element in the fostering of undergraduate scholarship and literary appreciation.