“Colleen M. Heflin and Madonna Harrington Meyer provide the most comprehensive mixed-methods analysis of food insecurity facing older adults to date. The detailed descriptive data are expertly complemented with rich contextual experiences of those seniors facing food hardship in their daily lives. The authors offer keen insights into the policy environment these vulnerable seniors must navigate and present a set of provocative recommendations to improve federal, state, and local policies. Food for Thought is a must-read for any scholar or policymaker interested in confronting the public health challenge of senior food insecurity.”
—James P. Ziliak, Gatton Endowed Chair in Microeconomics and director, Center for Poverty Research, University of Kentucky
“Colleen M. Hefflin and Madonna Harrington Meyer lift the veil on an unfolding crisis in America, but one that is hidden from view. Simply put, as America ages, more and more of our fellow citizens will reach retirement age only to find that they must embark on a perilous quest just to get enough food to eat. With precision, the authors describe the myriad dimensions of the crisis, and the multiple failures of both public and private strategies to address it to date. Food For Thought offers clear, tractable policy solutions to alleviate food insecurity, so that more elderly Americans can live with the dignity they deserve.”
—Kathryn J. Edin, William Church Osborn Professor of Sociology and Public Affairs, Princeton University
“This book combines the immense talents of two well-known scholars, one who studies aging and the other who studies food insecurity, stressing the importance of consistent access to a nutritious diet to maintain health in old age. The result is an eminently readable, understandable, and fact-filled volume about the seven million older adults in the United States who are food insecure. There are rich descriptions of how financial problems lead to competing claims on funds, with food often losing out to medicine or housing costs among older Americans. Food for Thought soberly assesses the limits to feeding programs, food-support programs, and income-support programs, concluding that there are many cost-effective policies could help seniors avoid having to choose between food and other needs, suggesting once again, if we just have the political will, the problem is solvable.”
—Timothy M. Smeeding, Lee Rainwater Distinguished Professor of Public Affairs and Economics and Hilldale Professor Emeritus, La Follette School of Public Affairs, University of Wisconsin–Madison