“More than forty years ago, Kuhn urged philosophers of science to take the history of science as a guideline in their own work. This book is a splendid example of what can result when they do. Critics of scientific realism have pointed to the way in which terms like ‘electron’ can change over the course of time, sometimes in drastic ways. How, then, can one take seriously the claim that the term designates the same entity throughout? Taking that same term as his focus and tracing its career up to 1925 in exhaustive detail, Arabatzis shows how attention to historical twists and turns can help to illuminate the slippery notion of meaning in ways that allow the realist to respond.”
— Ernan McMullin, director emeritus of the Program in History and Philosophy of Science, University of Notre Dame
""[The book] patiently and clearly, and sometimes eloquently, takes the reader through tyhe complex story that . . . is much more interesting and informative than the laundered potted history of 'achievements' typically served up to students. It remains always alive to the nature and significance of the issues at play. . . . For a practising physicist it should be a pleasure to read, and for the serious physics student it provides a valuable introduction to the subject."
— C.A. Hooker, Australian Physics
"A rich blend of philosophy and history of science. . . . Arabzatis' writing is of exemplary clarity."
— Joan Lisa Bromberg, Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences
"The author of this thought-provoking work is to be congratulated both for challenging some of our most cherished assumptions and for reminding us that the world of chemistry is not nearly as cut and dried as most chemists would have us believe."
— Dennis Rouvray, Chemistry World
"[Arabatzis] provides a valuable and informative history of the electron and the development of its representation."
— Miles MacLeod, Studies in History and Philosohy of Modern Physics
"A rich and innovative book in the history and philosophy of science, in which [the author] provides an excellent technical analysis of the evolving identity of the electron among physicists and chemists. . . . Arabatzis's history is embedded within a rich philosophical framework in which he asks questions about the nature of scientific discovery, meaning and reference in scientific theory, and the support given to scientific realism or anti-realism by this historical case study."
— Mary Jo Nye, Ambix