“Clever and elegant, this super close-up look at just a few moments in Strangers on a Train, Rope, and The Wrong Man goes to the heart of what it means to ‘view’ and ‘read’ any film—and by extension, any work of representational art. Because it brings the issue of interpretation back to the table, I would recommend Hidden Hitchcock to everyone who cares about the value and power of movies.”
— Dudley Andrew, Yale University
“The drama of Hidden Hitchcock is an amour fou between its subject and its author, the hypervigilant viewer whom Hitchcock baits with meaningless discrepancies and rankling imperfections. Studying those imperfections can be deranging, and one way to read Miller’s book is as an essay on the obsessive, socially isolating behavior moviegoing involves.”
— Max Nelson,, Cineaste
“Miller offers . . . a way to rethink the ways we watch and engage with all films, not just the Hitchcockian ones.”
— Popmatters
"Miller’s enjoyable, vivacious romp through viewing and reviewing the cinema of Hitchcock pioneers a compelling new approach to viewership and carves out new scholarly territory. This is a major contribution to the literature on Hitchcock and film studies more broadly. Essential."
— Choice
"For D. A. Miller, in his . . . excellent new book, Hidden Hitchcock, the master's films don’t only teach us, they tease us. Not a bullying kind of teasing so much as a strip kind of teasing, which is to say, they show us everything, just not that. A big part of Hidden Hitchcock's considerable pleasure lies in trying to figure just what that is. Miller takes us on an almost Herzogian (Werner, with a bit of Moses mixed in) quest to uncover a hidden drama playing out in the background of Hitchcock’s films. . . . Ultimately, Miller's book is a powerful polemic in favor of an old-school, deeply imaginative, defiantly subjective mode of interpretation that we might associate with Susan Sontag at her best, or Roland Barthes pretty much all the time. And it returns us to the problem of the unconscious in an era when theorists keep trying to wish it away."
— Ben Kafka,, Artforum
Tthe incredibly close formalist reading on display in Hidden Hitchcock should not be taken as a turning away from Miller’s more obviously political work on discipline and surveillance (in a Foucauldian sense), or on queerness, the closet, and textual pleasure. Rather it marks a continuation of a longrunning concern, namely, how the person, willingly or defiantly or ambivalently, is incarnated in narrative form, not by the smooth running of hermeneutic codes, nor by repressive enclosure, but by the very breakdowns, lapses, and stutterings of style."
— Film Quarterly
"Miller’s too-close readings asks those who follow to surrender the pleasures it derails for the much more tendentious, even obsessive-compulsive, pleasures it offers in return.”
— Hitchcock Annual